ASIAN SECRETARIES FORMATION

 

The theme chosen for this year was "Development, Traditional Values and Christian Responsibil­ity in the Asia/Pacific context". The group of 23 persons sponsored by national movements and fraternal organizations assembled in the Centre for Society and Religion, Negombo - a fishing vill­age 25 miles from Colombo city in Sri Lanka, on the 28th of February 1981 for a month long program. Thirteen of the 18 member national movements in the Region were represented. The Asia Forum on Human Rights, the UMCAs Asia and the Mission Intern Program of the BOGM were also represented.

The Program was "formally" inaugurated on the morning of March 1 by Mr. Ainsley Samarajivia, former Chairperson of the Sri Lanka SCM. The inaugural talk was not a speech, which laid down expectations from a group of young people, but a meaningful personal reflection of a person who has been with the SCM for over three decades. He chose the Gospel text of Luke 4:18 to explain his per­sonal involvement in the struggles for justice and how the SCM in the past helped people like him to grasp the situation in their country. Soon after, the group adopted a Resolution moved by the Korean participant, Choe Hyndok, expressing solidarity with the March First Movement in Korea and proceeded to draft a declaration in memory of this Movement.

 

NATIONAL MOVEMENTS:

The representatives from the national movements presented their reports for the next four days. Each participant was allotted a slot of time where he / she was expected to present a brief overview of their national situation and activities of their movements. All participants later conceded that preparations for presenting this brief but cohesive report was in itself an education process. Heat­ed arguments and discussions that followed the presentation concentrated mainly on the priorities and strategies engaged in their respective movements.

 

LECTURES AND DISCUSSIONS:

Following the national reports were the theoretical input from one of our resource speakers Samuel Ho, Executive Secretary, Asia Forum on Human Rights. His lectures, spread over three days were on "the Concept of Modernization and Traditional Values", "The Politics of Modernization and Development", and "The Bureaucratic State and the Rights of the People." His papers posed a challe­nge to the common understanding of certain concepts of the participants and identified in very deal terms the role semi-feudalism, bureaucratic capitalism and neo-colonialism plays in the obstruction of genuine development with people as subjects of their own history. An afternoon session was devo­ted to enable participants to identify violations of human rights in their countries.

 

 

Sri Lanka, fast moving into the grips of neo-colonial process, is officially following a po­licy of developing on the Singapore pattern. This is euphemistically referred to as the 'Singapore Model' in academic circles. The opening of the Free Trade Zone and the tourism 'industry' are just two examples of how a government has willfully by official acts of parliament, sold the country to the hands of foreign investors. Centuries of tradition and culture is forced to give way to the earning of a few dollars. A country which is agro-based is quenching to be 'industrialized' at the expense of its vast majority of people. Workers and peasants have no longer the rights they enjoyed and power is being centralized in the person of the President of the Republic. This is the reality of Sri Lanka as exposed to us by various speakers from Sri Lanka. Mr. Bernard de Soysa, Secretary General of the Lanka Sama Samaj Party talked on the Worders situations; Prof. Celun  Kadiragamar, Professor of History at the University of Jaffna, talked on 'The Christian Community'; Ms. Sunila Abhayasekara, a research scholar, on the "Womens' Situation", Dr. Mano singham of the Univeristy of Colombo on the 'Student Situation' and Mr. Newton Gunasinghe, a Social Scientist, on the 'Peasant Situation.'

This elaborate session on Sri Lanka was afforded to point out the harsh realities in our Region where the rulers, by deliberate economic planning marginalize the people to mere objects of develop­ment.

The Theological Sessions were led by Rt. Rev. Dr. Paulose Mar Paulose, Bishop of the Chaldean Church of the East, Kerala. Reflecting on the theme, "Development, Traditional Values and Christian Responsibility," the Bishop stressed that unless, we as Christians, shed our minority consciousness in pluralistic societies like Asia, we will not be able to work for a genuine transformation of the society where all peoples matter. Quoting Numbers 13:33, he urged the group to get out of the "grasshopper neurosis" and forge ahead to take the risk, because it is only the taking of risks that ultimately forms the major part of the peoples' struggles. His lectures spread over three sessions were interspersed with group discussion.

Mr. Michael Tharakan, Research Associate at the Centre for Development Studies , in India led three sessions on "Theoretical Premises of development," "Development as Human Development" and “Critical Analysis of Development models in Asia”.

Ms. Teresa Chong, Faculty member of the De La Salle University, Philippines spoke on the Asian Political Scene.

 

BIBLE STUDIES AND WORSHIP

One Bible Study Session was led by Sevaka Yohan Devananda on the theme "Birth-pangs of the New Age" based on Mathew 24:8. Eight worship sessions were conducted by the participants themselves. Emphasis was laid on experimental forms of worship and some of the participants led the Biblical reflections at these sessions. Folk songs and other art forms were widely used in the worship sess­ions.

 

WORKSHOPS:

Apart from group discussions that followed every presentation, the participants were divided into three workshop sessions for three days towards the end. The Workshops were an attempt to synthesize and crystalize certain key issues raised in the lectures and group discussions earlier, and to suggest follow-up actions. The workshops were on:

 

1. Structures of Domination and Peoples Struggles.

2. Church, Faith and social Justice.

3. Peoples' Struggle for Justice - A Student Christian Response.

 

The Groups, after having spent long hours in deliberation have been able to bring out specific recommendations for the WSCF.

 

The Working Group dealing with "Structures of Domination and Peoples Struggles" declared that, "we need to see the difference between a struggle for civil and democratic rights and the struggle for human rights. The struggle for human rights is one which involves the questioning of the struc­tures of domination and calls for a radical reorganization of society." It also clarifies that as Christians, our task is to seek an alliance with all the forces that are working towards change, and also recognizes the limitations that a student body like the SCM has, in being in the leadership of a liberation movement. Hence, it urges all student groups to be an integral part of the struggles for liberation recognizing the fact that it is the masses - the workers, the peasants, the urban poor and the cultural minorities - that has to lead the liberation struggles.

Looking at the question of "Church, Faith and Social Justice," the working group expressed concern over the attitude of the churches in Asia towards liberation struggles and stated that "the church should shed its minority complex and join hands with all oppressed peoples - that the church must be a living and dynamic body of people sensitive to the aspirations of the masses". Addressing itself to the question of Faith and Social Justice, the Working Group stated that "Faith is our response to God's action in this world....... our response is manifested as continua­tion of Jesus' mission: creation of the conditions both material and spiritual to attain the "whole­ness" of persons to become their best. We must situate our self-understanding within the context of the people struggle for a just and humane society.

A concrete recommendation that was made from the working group on "Peoples Struggle for Justice - A Student Christian Response" was to engage in theological reflections and to develop a theology that is relevant to the lives of the people. The group also reiterated the role of the SCMs to be a prophetic voice within the church challenging the church to be prophetic itself in its action.

 

Go to Praxis 1981, No. 2-4

Go to Praxis Section

Main Page