69

 

Re-thinking URM's Work in Asia

 

Asia presently continues to be saturated with problems related to population/ poverty, pollution/ political oppression and pluralities of religion, race and culture.

Asia, on one hand, has been blessed with natural and human resources, and rich cultural and religious heritage. In fact, these qualities give Asia the potential to be a powerful influence in global politics. Unfortunately, the Asian ruling elites have collaborated so extensively with Western superpowers that Asia is now gripped by the claws of foreign domination and oppression. Nowadays, foreign domination is largely carried out through TNCS and the build-up of military bases in Asia.

On the other hand, Asia's influence in world politics is testified to by the important role China has played as a permanent member of the UN Security Council, by Japan's achievement as one of the seven leading industrialized countries among the western bloc (G-7), and by India being the dominant country leading the non-aligned movement. Although their performance has been disappointing for the Asian people, there is hope yet that Asia may contribute to the reshaping of a New World Order.

The URM has, since its birth, been and continues to be identified as part of the social movement for building a humane society. Thus, URM has the responsibility to work at overcoming the existing erosive value systems, ideologies and practices. We should provide new alternatives for the fulfillment of life-giving values, life-changing ideologies and theologies which are relevant to our context. The new alternatives could be worked at

 

70

 

through bringing about peace, socio-economic justice, political and cultural well-being, and ecological balance and harmony. Our task is to find out various possibilities of mobilizing the people to form a non-governmental trans-boundary solidarity networking so that the Asian peoples' basic human needs and rights may be ensured.

The future is likely to bring us serious challenges on the whole question of racial and ethnic conflict, militarization and nuclear threat, ecological imbalance, and the exploitation of natural as well as human resources. The age of technology does not enhance a human quality of life but, in fact, drains the people of their basic human needs, their dignity and their country's natural resources. Therefore, URM as a social movement, has the important role of empowering the people for the fullness of life and should remain committed to such a task.

URM has attempted to put faith into practice for the last thirty years. Thirty years is a relatively short period compared to the two thousand year history of Christianity. We have to remind ourselves of this in order to encourage us to faithfully continue to work for the humanizadon of the oppressed, the exploited, and the marginalized.

Masao Takenaka, an eminent theologian and ecumenical leader, has testified to the effective work of URM over the years in his book. Cross and Circle. He has served before as a Moderator of the CCA-URM. During his term of service he was able to provide the URM with theological and biblical guidelines for its ministry. We are very proud to have produced his work which was presented at a number of ecumenical meetings. Here again, I would like to share with you his observations on the Asian URM:

The beginning of the regional program of UIM in Asia goes back to the First Asian Conference on Industrial Evangelism held in Manila, June 1958. This was the pioneering event by which the churches in Asia began to take seriously the challenge of industrial society in Asia.

Between 1958 and 1966 in the follow-up period, various churches in Asia organized national committees to carry out the work in this field. The primary task was seen as that of enlightenment. In order to pursue this work, which was a new field in most of the Asian churches, an educational

 

71

 

program among church leaders was required in order to get their support.

Then after 1968, it was called Urban Industrial Mission and now, Urban Rural Mission since the Christian Conference of Asia (CCA) Singapore Assembly in 1973. Is it accidental or something more than that to enlarge the territory? This is a very important point, since it expresses our perspective in the process.

Through our process of actual involvement, we have come to acknowledge that the important mission is to work with the poor and those who are exploited in Asian society. As he did in his day, if Christ were to come to Asia today, it is certain that he would work with the poor and suppressed people in Asia for the recovery of wholeness of humanity. Again through the actual process of involvement, we learned that for the liberation of the poor people we must have a consolidation of rural, urban and ethnic aspects of our work.

Thus, URM needs to continue working on the following emphases through particular concerns such as: personalities, localities, opportunities, solidarity and accountability. These concepts form five major characteristics of URM'S ongoing program.

 

Personalities

URM is to promote human dignity of unknown personalities who are the victimized and marginalized in our societies. It is a seldom acknowledged fact that our society is sustained by the sacrifice of numerous unknown personalities who are deeply committed individuals. They are represented by the factory workers, the farmers, the fisherfolks, the estate workers, and those who work to produce our daily necessities but who live in the shadowy comers of our dwelling places. Without the labor and sacrifice of these unknown personalities, our societies would surely collapse. Just as Jesus sought out the lost ones and restored them to fullness of life, it is our Christian responsibility to promote the enhancement of human dignity of these unknown personalities. On special occasions, government officials and foreign dignitaries usually pay their respect to the unknown soldiers who died in service for their country. Likewise, although

 

72

 

in a different spirit, the URM tries to respect and honor these unknown personalities for their contribution to our societies and for their achievements.

 

Localities

URM is to protect humanity and Mother Earth from unjust treatment and exploitation. The concrete locality is where the human community, in particular the grassroots, live and work. It is also the whole environment of the global village in which we live. As stewards of God, we have an innate responsibility for the people and the world we live in. Thus, the URM seeks to build up a strong solidarity network to protect especially the grassroots community against exploitation of their human resources and their environment. The URM, therefore, supports anti-pollution and environmental protection movements, industrial safety campaigns and peace movements as part of their efforts to enhance the well-being of the human community.

 

Opportunities

URM is to provide every person opportunities for developing self-worth, self-esteem, self-realization and the fulfillment of peoples' aspirations to participate for change. Opportunities for such possibilities come through the daily practice of basic Christian virtues of loving and caring for every person whom we encounter because each one is made in the image of God.

Through leadership formation and mutual exchange programs, opportunities are given to persons for sharing their stories, ideas and experiences related to peoples' movement in their local contexts. This is encouraged in the hope that they might develop their full potential and in the process be transformed for the betterment of their own lives and the lives of others, to help create a better world.

 

Solidarity

URM is to protest against existing exploitative, corrupt and oppressive systems. This must be done in order to root out the injustices which stem from such systems and as part of the process of building a just society. Peoples' solidarity in efforts to empower the people from all sectoral groups within our societies is crucial in order to bring about the realization of a just society.

 

73

 

Accountability

URM is to practice accountability. The URM, in our concern for theological and ideological reflection, is compelled to critically examine the issue of accountability in the light of our responsibility to God and to the people whom we are called to serve. URMers and all who claim to serve God in the various ministries for the building of a just society are accountable to one another for our words and deeds. This is necessary because we are responsible to the people who have entrusted us with the ministry of witnessing Christ in situations of injustice and oppression, in Asia as well as in other parts of the world.

We are all, therefore, accountable first of all to God, who through Christ gave us the command to make disciples of all nations. Secondly, we are accountable to the grassroots whom we represent, the churches who sent us, and to the supporting agencies whose financial commitment enables us to carry out the mission we have been entrusted with.

Our accountability to the above-mentioned is expressed concretely in the area of communication and publication. We publish reports on our major programs in order to communicate to them about the work we are doing.

We may draw inspiration from the Bible story about David and Goliath (1 Samuel 17:48-51). In this story, a small boy is able to overpower and destroy a giant by sheer courage and wit. We should, in that same spirit, adorn ourselves with courage and faith to tackle this giant oppressive mechanism by dealing with these urgent issues in order that we might share in bringing about the Kingdom of God in our midst.

 

URM in Asia

According to the Confucian Analects, every ten years signifies an important threshold for all human beings:

age of   30 — establishment

40 — becoming aware of what one can do

50 — mandate to heaven

60 — ear can be obedient

At the age of 30 one arrives at being a householder and becomes aware of the rituals pertaining to community life. As a

 

74

 

householder taking charge of family matters, one becomes a more responsible person in the home and the community. This status forms the basis of the nuclear family and extends one's involvement to the larger extended family life and social life as well.

Let us reflect and see the relevance of this Chinese philosophy for the work of URM in Asia. The URM initiatives in Asian countries has now covered a period of more than thirty years. This means that URM in Asia has reached the age of establishment and is to become a unique householder within the Christian community as well as in the secular society. The approaches and efforts of the URM in Asian countries has been to continuously empower the people at the grassroots. Quite a number of Asian URM networks are well-established and are doing good work as householders in their community. However, there are some URM networks which are not well-established even though they are nearly thirty years of age. Therefore, it is time for us to reflect again and to examine the true meaning of URM as a householder of God.

I wish to suggest some thoughts for our consideration:

-  ideologically, URM should provide a clear vision in building a genuine human community here and now;

-  theologically, URM should focus on the issues concerning human relationship to God in order to establish the Kingdom of God on earth; and,

-  socio-politically, URM should build a society where justice and peace can flourish.

It is in the above contexts that we URMers ought to reflect self-critically concerning our theory and our practice. It would be good for us to consider the whole question of establishment and the role of a householder with responsibilities in relation to URM work in Asia. At the age of 30, URM in Asia ought to be able to stand alone ideologically, theologically, structurally, financially and operationally.

 

URM Workers

St. Paul, in his epistle to the Corinthian church, gave a keen insight on the role of the Christian community at that time...

 

75

 

I did the planting, Apollos the watering, but God caused the growth... We are God's helpers (I Cor 3:6,9).

From Paul's insight we can get an idea of the role of the URM worker in participating in God's ministry. We URM workers should limit ourselves to being:

-  helpers (The Living Bible);

-  partners working together for God (The Good News Bible);

-  God's servants, working together (The New Revised Standard Version);

-  God's fellow-workers (The English Bible);

Our role then would be:

-  to plant a seed of the Gospel by articulating ideological and theological visions of the kingdom of God;

-  to water properly by providing new strategies and methodologies in order to sustain a society; and,

-  to commit ourselves to being God's co-workers, since it is God who has given the growth for the realisation of the kingdom of God on this earth.

Paul has given us a concrete example of what it means to be in partnership with God and our URM workers. He was a great missionary who was full of enthusiasm; he crossed the frontiers of countries, culture and ideology. Paul was also a great idealogue who was full of Christian conviction; he preached the Gospel; he witnessed concerning the life of Jesus and proclaimed Christ's victory over death. Paul was a great architect who was full of visions for the ministry; he established the Christian churches. He trained workers for mission work and travelled widely to oversee the work in various mission fields.

The URM workers should give serious attention to the planting work which is synonymous to programme initiatives. When planting it is of utmost importance to consider the right season and suitable weather conditions. Our planting in the ministry of URM requires us to highlight the right and relevant issues of our time and our society for the empowerment of the people.

Planting also takes serious consideration of the land space and the soil conditions in order to reap a good harvest. For URM work to thrive, we need to tackle the urgent and burning issues in our workplace and deal with them sensitively in order to create a

 

76

 

healthy ground for the further enhancement of people and their lives.

Timing is also a crucial consideration for the task of planting as there is a time for sowing and a time for reaping. URM workers have the responsibility to consider the right issues and the right time to act and respond in order that people might be truly conscientized and liberated to opt for the humanization of society. This is the most crucial element of the URM workers' mission tasks.

 

URM Concerns and Thrusts

The URM in Asia is trying to work closely together with the people to develop a new strategy based on the peoples' aspiration for social change. People can be empowered by exercising their own abilities to organise themselves for the transformation of society. A new mission is to be articulated both in theory and in practice within the Asian multi-cultural context. URM work needs to be concretized with regard to the respective issues whether rural, urban, fishery, ethnic and minority, migrant worker, economic justice, multi-faiths and cultures or peace and environmental issues.

Needless to say, this mission is not easy to carry out in our local contexts because of various constraints. Politically, most Asian countries are under dictatorial or authoritarian regimes, thereby depriving their peoples of the right to participate in creating a better society for all.

Socio-economically, Asians live within discriminatory and exploitative structures which have Western capitalistic values intricately woven into it. Thus, there is an evil force at work which subtly and continually nurtures a spirit of competition that ruptures the sense of community and the wholeness of creation.

Religio-culturally, we are diverse in our thinking and lifestyle. As such, antagonistic sentiments can be easily aroused to cause division so that the ruling governments may more easily take the peoples' attention away from more important issues. This will enable them to carry out their exploitative policies in collaboration with the West without much opposition, however, the URM in Asia will continue to deal with the immediate concerns and hold them in top priority of its mission task.

 

77

 

According to the Marxist view, the social system is divided into three spheres. The first is the family where love and care is the basic relationship between people. The second is the civil society wherein exists individualism and competition amongst people. The third is the state which tries to combine the two spheres into a unity.

It is needful that URM thrusts should focus on these three primary groups in its endeavour to help the people achieve the totality of their ideals and aspirations for bringing about a just society. The ultimate achievement of this is when we witness a real degree of human liberation in the family, the civil society and the state.

URM ideology is action-oriented. URMers hold the belief that people have the potential power within themselves to work for the betterment of their life through social changes. As such, the people demand and expect constant changes to happen within their respective situations. The rise of the masses of people/minjung to political consciousness and their direct participation in political changes is a good example of social transformation happening in the midst of modem historical developments of our time.

Authoritarians practise the way of 'initiative from above'. In other words, changes can only be brought about from top-down by bureaucratic reform. URM ideology, however, giving utmost respect to peoples' power, believes and practices the way of 'revolution from below', that is, from the grassroots upwards. We have sufficient examples of the success of peoples' movements in various parts of Asia.

I cannot over-emphasize the fact that URM thrusts should focus on the people—those who are oppressed, exploited and marginalised in Asian society. They are the ones capable of bringing about structural changes from the grassroots itself.

According to Mao Ze-dong, the term 'the people' holds different meanings in different countries and in different historical periods within each country. He further expounds that there is a four-class bloc, viz:

- the proletariat,

- the peasantry,

- the petite bourgeoisie, and

 

78

 

- the national bourgeoisie.

These four classes are struggling and competing with each other for greater participation in the leadership of the society. For Mao, revolution can only succeed when the poor peasantry are allowed to participate in the leadership roles in China. The locus of the people's power stems from the rural area and lie in the hands of the peasants. We can see from world history also that the working class people are the real power base in the socialist countries.

Herbert Marcuse, however, has a different opinion as to where lies the locus of people power. He holds that in advanced industrialized societies the working class is no longer a revolutionary force and that the revolutionary future resides among students, women, blacks and other alienated groups. These groups of people form the real power base. The growing consciousness of their own enslavement make them candidates of revolutionary action for social change.

The alienated groups in the urban and rural areas are the major thrusts of URM for their empowerment as subjects of their own history. Although Mao and Marcuse might be considered as old schools of thought in social studies, we URMers still need to study and know their theories in order to derive a better understanding for our ministry in the area of urban and rural concerns.

According to Mao, everything in the universe contains contradictions. These range from ideas to matters and to social relationships. Contradiction is the nature of reality. This means that certain contradictions will continue to exist in any social system. Furthermore, not all contradictions are the same. This is because there are antagonistic and non-antagonistic contradictions which constitute a special denial of certain elements, m classical Marxism, the major source of conflict in the world was the struggle that was constantly occurring between classes. The antagonistic nature of class conflicts or antagonistic contradictions can be resolved through complete victory of the proletariat. It is becoming clearer for us that the real power base is founded on people who are alienated and who no longer remain under a contradictory state but rather who want to be agents in bringing about social change.

We URMers claim to be 'the people of God', a term which goes back to the Old Testament, 'the people of Yahweh', those who

 

79

 

were liberated from slavery in Egypt. The liberation motif of the people, more specifically the liberation experiences of the people of God, will be a permanent source for URM involvement in the peoples' movement of which we are engaged in.

URM'S theology is a theology of the workplace where God's salvation and liberation is taking place through the peoples' struggle for self-realization. Therefore, URM'S theology should begin with the people—the grassroots—and reflect a biblical liberation story of the people of God, sharing the common vision of the people, and following the life of Jesus who liberates us from sin and frees us from all bondages of human enslavement. We are proud of the new developments of contextual theologies in our region, particularly in Korea, Taiwan and the Philippines. I am sure all of us are quite familiar with our own contextual theologies which deeply express our peoples' experience and faith in the light of the biblical message of God's work of salvation and liberation.

Consideration needs to be given also to URM'S place in the social movement, in other words, within the peoples' movement. The classical school of thought regarding social movements categorizes five dominant groups as leading forces in modern history. They are the labour movement, the students' movement, women's movement, the peace movement and environmental movements. The URM is related to all these important movements for the purpose of carrying out its ministry. The problem is that these social movements or peoples' movements have gradually developed into movement organisations, a result of institutionalization.

Of course, we recognise that every movement requires some sort of organisational structure in order to fulfil its aim and purpose and to ensure the smooth running of its day to day work. However, our weakness is that now we have lost the movement character of the past, which is actual action-oriented movement work. Whereas in the past the spirit of the movement was in the actual involvement in the lives of the people, now the institution has quenched the spirit of the movement.

Now is the time, therefore, to remember the past character of the movement and with a new spirit develop a radical movement through fresh and creative initiatives for URM work in Asia. We may retain the original character and spirit, as well as ideas and

 

80

 

concerns of URM but we must avoid the tendency to repeat old strategies and methods year after year. Instead, let us work towards developing new and radical paradigms to achieve the aspiration of the people for a just and peaceful society.

In conclusion, I urge everyone of us to work together in search of a new ecumenical vision in the spirit of unity, solidarity and sharing as we seek to strengthen the ministry of URM in Asia. (1992)