Part 1 — Women’s Stories

 

45

Australia

 

For Aboriginal Australians, colonisation continues

Gloria Brennan

 

Gloria Brennan presented a paper (here edited and abridged) on the situation of Aboriginal-Australians at the 1985 Australian-Pacific women's peace conference in Sydney. The conference was sponsored by Women's International League for Peace and Freedom.

The situation of Aboriginal women is often more serious than that of the men: "women bear the brunt of social disruption caused by an uneasy mix of black and white customs".1 Alcoholism among men and petrol sniffing among young people lead to a breakdown in traditional authority and family relationships. Women have suffered brutal physical and psychological harm from their men under the oppressive "reserves" system — whites hounded Aboriginal people off their land and forced them to live under white administration in limited areas. Gloria Brennan refers to the very high rates of imprisonment among Aboriginal people; the rate for Aboriginal women has been twice this in some states. Forced abortion and unsafe birth control methods have been used on Aboriginal women.

The women of ten point to white intervention as a cause for their loss of status among their own people: in traditional culture, women played a leading role in Aboriginal communities, but it was a role distinct from that of the men. Women had their own sacred sites and rituals; their contribution to the survival of their people (through food gathering) was crucial. White Australians have devalued the contribution of Aboriginal women by treating men as the proper voices of Aboriginal dissent or aspiration; white feminists have misinterpreted and misrepresented the suffering and aspirations of Aboriginal women — by failing to take into account both the severity of racism in Australia and the complexity of gender relationships in traditional culture, (ed)

 

I speak as one of the prior owners of this country. The land is still our land, contrary to popular belief. Unlike most of you in the Pacific and Asia, we do not run our own affairs. We do try to practise our own sovereignty. You see, our colonisers are still with us. We have been described as members of the fourth world: people who, like the Indians of Canada or America, Hawaiians, Inuits of Greenland or the Samis of Scandinavia, were the original owners.

In most places, we constitute less than two per cent of the population. And we are dependent. We're dependent on another culture, which runs our

 

46

 

country for us. Our relationship with our colonisers is similar to the relationship between aid givers and aid receivers in the third world. All the aid we get — and it does not only come in the form of money — has strings attached.

We live under third world conditions. The health and well-being of Aboriginal Australians depends now, as always, on a close material and deep spiritual relationship with our land. It depends on cultural integrity, and the material resources which would enable us to live in dignity: independently and self-reliantly. Since European "settlement" began almost 200 years ago, each of these requirements has been rudely disregarded: initially through a policy of murder and conquest (aided by exposure of Aborigines to infectious diseases with which we had no previous contact), then by moving us from our traditional lands, institutionalising our suffering and pauperising us, and then by forbidding us our culture.

By 1950, these policies had reduced the Aboriginal population of Australia to less than half that at the time of European invasion. Since then, however, there has been a rebirth of Aboriginal Australia — aided by significant international pressure, the more liberal attitudes of some other Australians and, especially, the efforts of Aborigines ourselves.

In theory, at least, the policies of assimilation and cultural genocide have been swept away. The official policy of the current federal government is to permit Aboriginal self-management and self-determination. Limited land rights have been granted in some areas, and most of the legal machinery responsible for official discrimination has been dismantled. There have been, however, some problems in realising these new policies: the largest is that most programmes affecting Aborigines are under the control of state governments — all of them, to varying degrees, hostile to the new policies.2

Disadvantages which Aboriginal people suffer are all inter-related: they occur in the fields of education, law, employment, housing, income and health. Aboriginal people have the highest birth rate in the country, the worst health and housing, and the lowest educational, occupational, economic, social and legal status of any identifiable section of the Australian population. The Australian education system still discriminates against Aborigines: in most schools, Aboriginal history, culture and languages are belittled. Aboriginal people constitute about 1.3 per cent of the population, yet more than thirty per cent of prisoners are Aborigines. Australian law is based on the fiction that the continent was unoccupied when Europeans arrived. More than half of Aborigines able and willing to work are unemployed. More than seventy per cent live in grossly unsatisfactory housing, according to the government's own reports. A substantial proportion of the remainder live in housing which would be suitable if it were not so overcrowded. The present rate of housing development is well below the growth rate of the Aboriginal population.

The typical Aboriginal family is about twice the size of a typical non-Aboriginal one yet, because of its age structure, it has only half the number of potential income earners. Combined with unemployment and poor education, this means that the average Aboriginal income is much lower than that of

 

47

 

An Aboriginal woman behind bars in a country town in Queensland, Australia. Of all the Australian states, Queensland has perhaps the worst record for official mistreatment and neglect of blacks. The conservative administration, however, refuses to keep records of numbers of Aborigines imprisoned – because to differentiate in such a way would be “racist”.

Photo: The Age, Melbourne.

 

48

 

non-Aborigines. This leads to dependence on welfare which, rather than helping Aborigines, makes them poorer.

Aboriginal Australians are prey to many infectious and lifestyle diseases, all of which have their roots in poor living conditions or a feeling of futility in many communities. Respiratory, gastro-intestinal, skin, eye and ear diseases occur in epidemic proportions. They are not under control. Poor diet and unsanitary conditions lead to malnutrition and malabsorption of food. Diseases like diabetes and hypertension are also prevalent and significant.

What do we want? Aborigines realise that, in order to regain health, we must regain control over our lives. This involves control over our own budgets and our own affairs.3 It involves land rights and compensation for lost land, and it involves the removal of discriminatory practices.

 

Notes

1.   See LEGGE, Kate, "Song of the women of the rock". The Age, Melbourne, March 14, 1986, pll.

2.   Since Ms Brennan presented this paper in 1985, the federal government — responding to an hysterical anti-land rights campaign conducted by mining companies, and urged on by another "left wing" government in the state of Western Australia — has backed away from its promise to grant land to Aboriginal people. It explains this injustice in terms of "public opinion":

relying on dubious interpretations of a statistical survey, the federal government alleges that it will not be re-elected if it implements land rights policies, because too many Australians oppose them — ed.

3.   The federal department which deals with Aboriginal people is aptly named the Department of Aboriginal Affairs.