5

Introduction

Participants of the Consultation on HRD/Leadership Program and Movement Building were divided into three groups:

A) Ex-Participants 82-87

B) National Representatives

C) Women (Ex-participants/National Representatives

Each group was assigned the task of formulating a composite report based on the outcome of the discussions that followed after each representative presented their personal reflection and national situation/ according to the guidelines given by the A/P Region. These are:

A. Assessment of HRD ‘82- ‘87 by HRD ex-Participants

i) Evaluate the educational process of HRD -inputs/contents and program structure/ resource persons/ national reports / including the logistics.

ii) Consider and comment on the current methodology/style of education – e.g. inputs/ exposure/ national reports/ workshops etc.

Is the process and structural format participatory in nature? Please elaborate.

iii) Assess the role of women and their participation in the HRDs and the place given to them in the educational program.

iv) What is the result and impact of HRDs on individual women and men in the SCM and society at large?

v) Is any country marginalized? e.g. language/communication difficulty/ etc. Please elaborate and suggest solutions.

vi) In the light of your critical assessment/ give constructive suggestions to the improvement of leadership formation program.

vii) What are/were the National Movement's expectations of the HRD program? Were the expectations met? if not/ why?

B. Overall assessment of HRDs by National Movement Representatives

i) List out the total number of participants sent by your National SCM: number of male/female/ student/senior friend.

ii) What are/were the National Movement's expectations of the HRD program? Were the expectations met? If not/ Why?

iii) What is the overall evaluation of HRD Programs participated by members of SCM? What is the impact on members and SCMs? Were there any follow-up measures taken? How? elaborate/describe.

iv) How have your HRD participants contributed to the growth of the National Movement? What degree of responsibility and leadership have they taken up? Have they shown readiness for full-time involvement?

6

v) How have they contributed to the leadership and decision-making processes in the national churches? Are they taking initiative and providing leadership in the ecumenical community?

vi) How involved are they in action for justice and peace in the larger society/and with social interested or action-oriented groups?

C. Assessment of Women's Program

i) The needs of women's concern in national movements and on regional level.

ii) Difficulties foreseen/experienced in carrying out women's work at the national/regional level.

D. General and broad guidelines for all participants and facilitators of the Consultation

i) What is the SCM self-understanding in its relationship with the Church and People's Movements? (including the kind/nature of relationships formed)

ii) Evaluate the relevance of National SCM and WSCF to national movements (taking into account WSCF history/ structures, vision and theology).

iii) What is your national SCM's Leadership Program for Movement Building? How does your national movement conduct leadership training program?

iv) Any other issues and concerns, which are important to you and your National Movement.