34
OVERALL EVALUATION OF THE SCM
An
overall evaluation of the SCM was made after the review based on the
abovementioned points/areas. The following is the summary of the overall
evaluation and the respective question or guideline.
1.
What is your general impression of the SCMs in the AsiaPacific
region?
*
As each SCM works within a specific context or situation depending on the
realities of the country or society, their functions and activities are also
different from each other.
*
Most of the movements had to undergo a lot of struggle and face a lot of
challenges in their work. Very rarely did any movement have a smooth operation
of their programmes, activities and visions. This is
all because of institutionalized forces and some social elements that do not
want things to change and so prevent the SCM from achieving their goals and
visions.
*
The goals and visions must be made relevant to the present situation and
contemporary issues facing the region. In many movements the goals and visions
were focused on the past.
*
The present corps of SCMs can learn from senior members and friends who were
engaged in political reform and social change. The present SCMs must do
something concrete or the SCM will just disappear.
*
Link between the SCMs is very weak. There is hardly any contact among the
various movements within the region and so the members are ignorant of each
other's programmes and activities. Although the
national SCMs work within their respective social/political/economic/cultural
contexts, they can support each other and sustain their solidarity as one big
movement.
35
*
The SCM needs to reassert its credibility as a Christian movement with the
other groups.
2. What did you
learn about the SCMs in the Asia-Pacific based on those represented in the
HRD'91 (with regards to structure, organizational set-up, self-understanding, programmes, theological-biblical understanding, etc.)?
*
There is a need to go out into the field and mix with the people -- i. e. more action than just reflection and theories. There
is a need to integrate with the people, understand their problems and needs, in
order to realize the goals, visions and aims more clearly.
*
The goals and visions of the movement must be relevant to the contemporary
social issues; priorities must be made according to the current situation.
*
The structure, while an essential part of the movement, must not be rigid. It
should be flexible, suited to the changing needs of the movement.
*
If SCM really believes in equal participation of women and men, it must strive
at effecting participatory processes and consciously involve more women in the
decision-making process of the movement.
* Programmes and activities should be action-oriented and
relevant to the issues and realities of the society.
*
There is a need to be consistent in conducting programmes
-e.g. Bible study, leadership training, etc. -- and to develop men's and
women's caucuses, special leadership training programmes
for women, and even publication of newsletter dealing with women's issues.
*
There should be more exchange programmes between the
SCMs in the Asia-Pacific region to learn more about each
36
other's work and to support one another.
3. What did you
learn about the relationship between the SCM and the church?
*
Some participants were not very clear about the question of SCM-church
relationship. There seemed to be a need to define the meaning of the church and
of church transformation all over again.
*
Other participants felt there was a need for more than just mere definition;
what to do about the relationship between the church and SCM is a much harder
thing to do. They felt this needed an intense soul-searching.
4. What can you
say about the question of women and men within the SCM, the WSCF and the
society as a whole?
*
There is a need for more commitment from both women and men to deal with
women's issues.
*
There is a need for analysis on which to base the issues regarding class,
gender, race.
*
There is a need for more biblical and theological reflection on the whole issue
of women-men partnership.
*
The issue of women-men partnership must start with oneself and then advocate to
others.
*
There should be renewal of family life and so transcend barriers to
partnership.
*
If we believe in partnership, then we should stop referring to the other sex as
opposite sex but as complement; only complementary beings can build up a
partnership.
37
