1

THIS ISSUE

 

The 2nd Quarter of this year sees the end of two years work in WSCF AISA. This issue of PRAXIS takes a look at the thrusts mandated by the 1974 Asia Com – committee. The narrative and analytic documents of the three sub – regional Asian Leadership Development Conferences (ALDECs) held at the end of 1975 present a fairly good picture of the seriousness and attention given to the priorities by the member movements and the regional staff.

In a region, which is basically agricultural, the land issue is central to the economic, social and political well – being of the people. Talks on the manifest problems of poverty and leaping population, which have taken gigantic proportions in South Asia, must necessarily focus on the mode of production, which in this case, is the feudal landowner / landless toiler system. This is the crux of the studies and reflections done at the South Asia ALDEC.

East Asia ALDEC tackled the issue of Militarism and Human Rights, again, not as a separate problem but as part and parcel of the economic and political hegemony drive of the big powers over the region. The insidious symbiotic relationship maintained by the military powers and political elites in the countries of the region have brought about a kind of development which further widens the chasm between the rich and the poor and an increasing suppression of the basic rights of people and their struggles to claim what is due them as human beings.

Since WSCF is a student service organization, its base is found among students. But its orientation is towards Liberation of peoples from all fetters of injustice and oppression. Thus, Southeast Asia ALDEC focused its study and deliberations on how students can learn from and relate with farmers and workers – who ultimately shall decide on what course to take for their own liberation. The need to continue to learn from them is spelled out by those who attended the workshop.

World Student Christian Federation in Asia and around the world is only one of many small movements that have opted for Liberation. Even as it goes about carrying out this self – imposed task, it continues to seek to understand not only the problems that are on the way of man’s total liberation, but of itself: Its past, its life in the present, and its direction for the future. This is the burden of the special feature, The Self – Understanding of the Federation, which was arrived at in January 1976, during the meeting of the Executive Committee in Canada.

Finally, WSCF’s understanding of itself and the world emanates from its understanding of society from the standpoint of the Christian Faith. This is given emphasis in the two theological reflections in this issue.

 

2

 

SPECIAL FEATURE

 

THE SELF-UNDERSTANDING OF THE WSCF

1. The Federation has existed for eighty years. They have been difficult years, in which theological and organizational problems were linked strongly with the fundamental questions of Christian identity in a century of profound social change.

Looking back at this history we could say, as said the Judge of Israel, Samuel, when he put a stone between Mizpah and Shechem, "Eben – Ezer", that is, "up till now the Lord has helped us". (I Samuel 7:12).  But rather than giving ourselves the impression of a majest­ic continuity to certain presuppositions and programs, the history of these eight decades of the Federation appears to us as a history of rapid changes.  Born as a vanguard of missionary work before the First World War, the Federation became a vanguard and champion of the ecumenical movement. The Federation, especially in Europe, also took active part in the struggle against Fascism.  For the years after the Second World War, a major emphasis was Christian "presence" in the world, which later concentrated on the theme of "Christian Presence in the Academic World", and a concern for the Life and Mission of the Church.  Most recently, it has defined its central concern as "Christian Witness in the Struggle for Liberation", as summarized in the discussion paper drawn up at the Executive Committee meeting in Buenos Aires, Argentina in July 1974.

2. The Buenos Aires paper underscored the changes that have taken place throughout the Federation since 1968. The regional reports presented in 1976 illustrated three elements in these changes, which were also emphasized at Buenos Aires:

a)       the centrality of the struggle for liberation for a more just and human society

b)      a new stress on theological reflection understood not as a statement of doctrine but as a reflection which starts from speci­fic historical situations, and which expresses the problems and hopes of people in their struggle for social justice

c)       a new commitment among the movements to the difficult yet crucial task of carrying on the struggle for liberation within the community of the church, of which they are an integral part.

We note that the Buenos Aires Executive Committee did not intend the Buenos Aires paper to define a raison d' etre for the WSCF. The paper was simply an attempt on the part of the Executive Committee to point to issues it thought were important. Over the last year and a half, we have experienced difficulty in bringing about reflec­tion on the major points stressed in the paper. Now we must dis­cover and implement a mechanism to allow this process of reflection to take place.

Looking towards the future, we consider it imperative that we try to give a more precise outline to the work of the Federation, reflecting both our tasks and the reality of our movements.  Given this intention, we will try to outline the function the WSCF might play.

3. Up till now, the WSCF has refused to become either a Christian political organization or an ecclesiastical youth organization. The WSCF has always been a meeting place for groups with a variety of political experiences who were critically concerned with the life and mission of the Church.  We must move from being this earli­er movement of opinion to being an organization, which defines con­cretely its role in relation to political struggles, and in relation to the churches and the ecumenical bodies.

 

3

 

Unless we develop this clearer self-understanding and praxis, we run the risk of progressively losing our more politically commit­ted people.  They will find little to draw them to SCM or WSCF act­ivities.  On the other hand, if we do not take serious account of the demands of the less politically involved people in our SCMs, we run the risk of losing this other sector of our constituency.

The WSCF is not a Christian political organization.  It is not an ecclesiastical youth organization – not the "church of tomorrow". For us, it is part of today's community of believers called the Church.  The WSCF strives to become a community of believers looking for new ways of expressing faith in the context of a political commit­ment to the struggle for economic, social and political liberation. Within our community, we find ourselves struggling with at least four concerns:

a.       we are challenged by the need of developing more profoundly our understanding of and involvement in the theoretical and practical aspects of the struggle for liberation;

b.      we need to discover new ways of reading the Bible, and of reflecting theologically in the context of our political commitment;

c.       we also recognize that we are caught in the life of institu­tional churches whose witness is often muted, and we work towards a day of renewal;

d.      As a student movement, we are particularly involved in the problems created by the situations of the educational and political realities of our time, and we are challenged by the question of what it means for us to express our Christian witness and our politi­cal commitment in the midst of the educational institutions of the present.

Thus, our life is lived within the tension of the interplay between our efforts at theological understanding and our political involvement.  We are nurtured by both, and find each bringing judgment and hope to the other.  We hope also in the tension of our structure as a federation of movements grouped in regions.  These realities form the basis of our understanding of our functions as a community.

4. We do not intend to become a bureaucratic structure, and we, therefore, do not need a complex organization. We are sure that the Federation lives and develops on the basis of the validity of its goals and on its capacity to take initiatives.  To insure efficiency and continuity, however, it is necessary to distinguish the follow­ing organizational levels and functions.

Our community expresses itself first in our SCMs. These are not the major locus of our political commitment, which, for us, must take shape within the organizations of peoples struggling for liberation. In this sense, the SCM would be a place and a space where political experience is confronted by our faith and the reality of the Church. Consequently, we hope that the SCM is not a place of retreat, but as a part of the Church, an instrument of intervention in the Church's community.  We are fully aware of the immensity and complexity of this challenge, and we would like to encourage our SCMs to tackle this task creatively, bearing in mind that the activities of many of them provide sufficient basis for this process to take place.

The assessment of seven years of regionalization is largely a positive one.  The regions provide a unifying nucleus for the move­ments, giving an instrument for national movements to face problems with which they cannot deal by themselves.  In addition, the regions are a place of openness and opening where common steps maybe under­taken in a manner, which upholds at the same time the freedom of the national movements.  The region is also a structure for challenging the national movements towards broader issues and larger perspectives.

The function of the WSCF at the inter – regional level is similar in its relation to the regions as is the function of the region with regards to the movements. The Federation implements this function through its General Assembly, its Executive Committee and its General Secretariat. The WSCF at the inter-regional level discusses specific problems of the life of the Federation, synthesizes the work done on all levels, and elaborates plans for the future.  In addition to these fundamental tasks, the inter-regional organs of the WSCF have the responsibility of assuring the financial means and the necessary financial controls for the life of the Federation, its programs and its regions. Finally, they have the responsibility of relating to other ecclesiastical and international organizations.

Aware of shortcomings and vacillations and in the difficult search for an identity in the midst of the social, economic and political struggles of our time. We consider it decisive to be an active community  devoted to the  honor of God, a community that is conscious that this honor is not and shall never be its honor, and that it is necessary to find people who are prepared to celeb­rate this honor with words and deeds.

 

Torture

These methods of torture are being constantly developed and further refined. It is estimated that in Argentina alon, 73 different methods have been used in the last decade.  There are even "schools of torture".  One such school was found in the headquarters of the hated Directorate of Security (DGS) after the coup in Por­tugal.  There is evidence to suggest that the officers of one Asian country were trained in the techniques of interrogation, and even torture, by another country in the region.

 

Responsibility

Guerilla groups and liberation movements have been known to torture their vic­tims, but it is the state, which must bear the major part of the responsibility for the existence of torture, to extract information and control dissent.  However, rather than shore up their authority by the use of such dubious-and highly unethical prac­tices, they should courageously resign and entrust the task of governing to more competent and upright men who will dismantle unjust structures in society which give rise to violence and torture.

 

4

 

REPORTS

 

ALDECS 1975: 3 SUB-REGIONAL WORKSHOPS

 

Three Asian sub-regional ALDECs were held in October, November and December 1975 respectively.  They represented a change of focus from the traditional leadership training seminars that ALDEC used to imply.  The three workshops are the result of a growing awareness among SCMs of the need to relate to the struggle for liberation in our region.  They concentrated on certain priorities: issues in which SCM members were deeply involved.

As such, the themes for the South Asian workshop was Land, Pop­ulation and Poverty; for the East Asia workshop, it was Militarism and Human Rights; and for South East Asia workshop, Students, Pea­sants and Workers.  Although the contents of these three workshops were similar in some aspects, yet it was advantageous to have the workshops along sub-regional division as it facilitated more in­volved discussions and action planning.

 

SOUTH ASIA CONSULTATION

The South Asia ALDEC was held in Ibbagamuva, Sri Lanka.  The participants came from Sri Lanka, India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. They spent three out of ten day sessions in a government collective farm and in a village run by a voluntary sharamadana movements known as the Sarvodaya.  The rest of the days were spent at the Devarasana collective farm. Participants and their groups have spent a few months on studying and doing field research on the problems of some villages before attending this workshop.

The Consultation achieved its primary objectives of exchanging living local experiences of national movements on the theme; reflect­ing the field experimental action of the program critically based on the Christian faith; exploring and laying down the foundation for in-depth socio-political and economic analysis, giving suggestive directions to agencies, bodies or institutions which are interested and sensitizing all members of the movements.

During the exchange of ideas, the participants tried to find a unifying force with which they could overcome their differences. They felt that they were part of the oppressed class, which they had studied and this created an awareness that they had common goal to achieve, which is, to fight oppression.

There was a conscious effort to be open to each other, since the ideological commitment of the group was diverse.  Persons from different backgrounds and field experiences participated in the discussions. People's participation was the focus of the delibera­tions and attention was given on how to create solidarity and aware­ness among the oppressed rural masses.  Students were encouraged to link up with progressive political groups and create issues on the unjust conditions of the rural masses.

Aware that their study found irrefutable facts regarding the basic historical process of society as a history of class conflict, participants felt the need of a vision to further strengthen their struggle. The experiences of institutions like Devasarana, an experimental project based on living faith-dialogue enlightened the theological moorings of the struggle.

 

5

 

A cordial relationship between the participants and the villagers prevailed throughout the consultation.  A social evening was arranged with the local people at the end of the seminar.  Around 300 people from the village enjoyed a cultural program organized by an amateur group of dancers who were farmers.  The day before the last, the group invited the local villagers for lunch with an informal discussion in a makeshift meditation hall, previously used as a poultry house. Every one sat on the floor, there was no chairperson, and some Sri Lankan friends acted as interpreters.  In reciprocation, the secretary of the village organization invited the group to lunch at his house. This same man was present throughout the entire consultation and shared valuable information of the life and problems of farmers.

On the whole, the consultation has helped the participants reflect among themselves and to be more responsible in continuing the struggle.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EAST ASIA SEMINAR

The East Asia ALDEC was held in Hong Kong for participants from Japan, Indonesia, Thailand, Hong Kong, Papua New Guinea, the New Hebrides, Singapore, Malaysia and the Philippines.  The workshop brought together fifteen people who have been involved in the study, research and action groups   counteracting repression in a militarized situation.

The participants gave accounts of the overpowering military presence and tight martial control in their countries.  The growing number of political prisoners testify to this fact.  The complex process of sup­pression involves:

a.       the militarization of politics at the expense of human lives;

b.      the presence of foreign military troops and various forms of military aid;

c.       suppression of basic human rights;

d.      suppression of indigenous grassroots movements;

e.       introduction of repressive laws; and

f.        the creation of a false image of the existing order through censorship of media and authoritarian education under the guise of nation­al security to get the nation moving towards 'development'.

 

6

 

This is accompanied by the creation of a military order more awesome than anything the world has seen, which consumes the resources of the people while brutally suppressing them.

The group devoted also some time in reflecting over the relevance of the Christian faith to the concrete situations that each participant was in. There was a general acceptance that governments have overtly, or covertly worked against the causes of justice and genuine peace for the majority of people. In such a situation     Christians must be relentless in their efforts to identify with groups who are working to achieve justice and genuine peace.

The participants also tackled a two-pronged task. One was an in­volvement with the criticism of the established order by means of re­search analysis and documentation of existing conditions with particu­lar emphasis on the role of militarism vis-a-vis political and economic structures. The second task was the formulation of provisional but not arbitrary alternatives that approximate the Christian ideals of justice. This includes:

a.       support of progressive organizations, political prisoners and the restoration of human rights;

b.      the ecumenical spirit of dialogue and support beyond the Christian community to include Buddhist, Muslim and other faiths;

c.       development of a liberating education; and

d.      the establishment of an effective communications network that could forge closer links on a regional basis.

The participants recognized that the struggle within a nation could be assisted and that international efforts to advance the cause of the struggle was of tremendous help to an oppressed people, isolated and deprived.  Thus, participants proposed that the Asia Office set up a Centre of Communications, which would seek and identify interested indi­viduals and groups within and outside Asia and establish a good flow of information to and from them.  Of great importance is the ability of such a centre to relay urgent matters for mobilization of people, interest groups and organizations.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SOUTH EAST ASIA WORKSHOP

About 20 participants coming from Sri Lanka, Thailand, Malaysia, Philippines, Indonesia, Papua New Guinea and the New Hebrides attended the East Asia ALDEC held in Sawangkaniwas, Thailand on 7-13 December.

All participants have been exposed in varying degrees to the prob­lem situations of peasants and workers.  At this workshop, the terms

7

 

peasants” and “farmers” were used synonymously tom mean rural people who make a living by growing crops. A few of the participants were fulltime organizers for a number of years, others were students who have just started or have the intention of working with the grassroots. The majority were middle class students whose involvement with the people and empathy with their problems were motivated by feelings for human dignity and injustice.

In every locality where participants were involved with farmers and workers organizing for their rights, their governments through the police or military have intimated and repressed all of them, or have encouraged criminal groups to harass the people.

 

The common problems of farmers in Asian countries discussed at the workshop are:

1)       dislocation due to government policies such as transmigra­tion, counter-insurgency and land development schemes;

2)       superstitution of rural women due to economic hardship and ignorance;

3)       the paternalistic and arrogant attitudes of government, commercial and religious institutions;

4)       landlessness, the landlord / tenant relationship, debts;

5)       the semi-feudal, and semi-capitalist structure of society and

6)       malnutrition.

 

The common problems among workers are:

1)       inhuman treatment by management;

2)       inadequate wages and poor working conditions;

3)       insecurity of job;

4)       high accident risks ;

5)       lack of proper housing; landlessness and

6)       poor health.

 

In dealing with these problems, three concrete tasks must be car­ried out. They are political education, mobilization and organization. These three are inter-dependent.

Politicization means not only involvement in party politics. More important than that, it means re-education from the colonial and elitist orientations towards identification with the farmers and workers of our countries. The majority of students lack awareness and commitment, but there is also a radical minority who are capable of giving up their middle-class aspirations to serve the people totally. Christian students, in particular, have to overcome their religious hang-ups in order to identify with the oppressed in their countries who are mostly non-Christians.  Religious institutions may be used to a limited extent but in the final analysis, the oppressed are the ones to effect a radical change of structures.

People's organizations are composed, directed and managed by the people themselves as opposed to those, which are organized for them. In the process of forming people's organization for power, the imagi­nation of the people is liberated. This process naturally takes a long time, but the results are worthwhile- confidence and collective strength.

Fieldworkers must always be alert to the positive and negative aspects of each situation.  They should have the attitude of learning. Support from the people in any action is essential.  Three main fac­tors are considered in organizing people: a) the demand is right and just, b) the people either succeed or fail in getting their demands, c) there must be a certain level of preparation among technical ad­visers, leaders and people's representatives.

Self-criticisms, reflection and evaluation are essentials of organ­ization. It can be done skillfully during a religious celebration or a meeting, and it could be a combination of the informal and the formal.

 

The participants outlined a list of national priorities, which are:

1)       working with farmers and workers on development and change;

2)       working with students to orientate them towards the con­ditions of the grassroot people;

3)       struggle for independence and self-reliance;

4)       participation in socio-economic programs and community development;

5)       struggle against political and economic imperialism; and

6)       campaign for the release of political prisoners.

 

The regional priorities were defined as:

1)       forging solidarity and cooperation;

2)       formation of a support group for national priorities;

3)       provision of a communication and documentation network which will be helpful to farmers, workers and fieldworkers to help systematize the experience of those in the struggle;

4)       exchange of experiences to improve skills; and

5)       selection of students who are really involved with farmers and workers to attend workshops of this nature.

 

There are two levels of documentation:

1)       documentation of certain actions is needed to Influence public opinion and to obtain wider support; and

2)       documentation of experiences, data, insights, information which will help create mutual support, learning and sharing of involved situations, strategies and methodologies.  The second should have a limited circulation.

The participants decided to start a bi-monthly newsletter, which would focus on work methods, ideological discussions, field situations and appropriate technology.  Each country will take turns in editing and collecting data. This will then be distributed to the participants by the WSCF Asia Office.

 

Evaluation

In general, participants have found this workshop constructive. Some have found friends of similar commitment. Some were disappointed by the insufficient experience of many of the participants vis-a-vis farmers and workers. The lack of participants with the same level of involvement has resulted in the failure to plan a cohesive regional program. However, participants felt that they have benefited from exposure to different situations and people with much deeper experience.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

TWO NATIONAL REPORTS*

 

Sri Lanka

Sri Lanka achieved political independence in 1948, but this did not mean economic independence.  Hers was an import-export economy: the three plantation crops of tea, rubber and coconut earning 85% of foreign exchange and total dependence on outside sources for consumer goods.

The SLFP victory of 1956 achieved a bloodless revolution in many directions – the emphasis on national languages, the emphasis on the rural masses and the nationalization of oil companies, of transport, cargo and insurance dramatically changed the island's history.

The 60's was the first 'development’ decade with its emphasis on the increase of the gross national product. But the end of the decade made it quite clear that 'development' far more than being measured by increased productive capacity, requires major transformations in social and economic structures.

In 1970, questions such as land reform, nationalization of foreign assets and the whole question of poverty and bridging the gap between the rich and the poor became burning issues of the day. These were picked up by the U.F. government on its sweeping election victory. They promised radical changes, but they were slow in implementing them and it was the April 1971 uprising that acted as a catalyst.  The last four years have seen radical changes in education, land, housing and the introduction of ceiling on incomes, capital levy and declara­tion of assets.

There was a deliberate attempt to break away from the old capital­ist structure and create in its place a socialist society.  Another step taken towards this direction is Land Reform (Amendment) Act, which was gazetted on the 15th. This historic bill will nationalize all Sterling companies in Sri Lanka, which are strangulating the economy.

It would not be wrong to say that the SCM even though only very peripherally was still caught up in this whole process of social change. The choice of the theme "Land, Population, Poverty" for the South Asia Area compelled us to get into grips with the whole issue of land reform and poverty.

We tackled this issue through a) organizing short week-end 'live-ins' or work camps to collective farms in order to expose the students to the life of rural Sri Lanka and the hazardous experience of agri­cultural workers, and b) basing the Annual Conference on the theme and publishing conference papers prepared by students.

The first method had its focus on Devasarana and the Devasarana Collective Farm.  The Devasarana Collective Farm came into being in June 1971.  It arose in the context of a dialogue on Land Reform by a People's Committee at Ibbagamuva.  The development work that is being attempted has to be seen in the context of the whole movement of conscientization.  It is concerned with the ideological as well as practical problems involved in building a new socialist society. The Farm is on 14 acres of coconut land interspersed with the culti­vation of grains, vegetable and pulses.

Every live-in involved participation in the daily chores of the farm – tilling the soil, etc. together with the young collective farmers.  There is a mixed diet of work-study-discussions – and silence for meditation at the "sessions".

 

* The Sri Lanka report was given during the South Asia ALDEC and the Japan report at the East Asia ALDEC.

 

Devasarana and the Devasarana Collective Farm has certainly had its conscientizing effects on SCMers. It has opened them to a new kind of experience – for many it was their first experience with rural Ceylon and their first and only con­tact with agricultural workers. It was the first step in bridging the separation between manual and mental work, and to the lopsided value system of our urban so­ciety, which placed such high value on mental achievements. To some, it was the birth of their social awareness and to others the experience gave a sharper and in­creased social awareness.

Apart from Devasarana, two week visits were made to Uda-Gira, a community farm and the other to 'Seranis' a government collective farm.

We shall now attempt a critical assessment of these three farms:

                     i.      Agricultural Output - The Serapis collective farm had the highest agricul­tural output. This reveals the need for sufficient technical know-how. Lack of such skills and planning ability has been a real problem for Devasarana – the far­mers felt the need for special knowledge. In Uda-Gira, low yields and constant crop failure are due to the very poor natural conditions. Lack of water being the main reason. The hazardous life of the dry zone farmer and the grueling nature of work in the open made their lasting impression on the participants. The Serapis experiment in inter-cropping which was also being tried out by Devasarana shows the extent to which we could diversify our agriculture.

                   ii.      Management - In all three farms, decision-making was in the hands of the collective farmers. Serapis being the largest with a membership of 65 worked its decision through committees - the wide variety of the committees ranging from mar­keting and production to financial, political and cultural showed that collective decisions governed every area of life. Devasarana and Uda-Gira had just one com­mittee as they were smaller in number. Daily meetings to discuss and plan out work was common to all farms.

Perhaps here we should also tackle the question of ownership. It is very im­portant that land should belong to the farmer. In any of the farms, the land does not belong to the collective farmers. The tenancy of the farmers is not assured. This can naturally have an impact on output. Also, the relationship of those who work on the farm and those who work for the Aramaya is affected by the fact that the latter does hardly any manual work and the distinction of administrative work is drawn and it has unconsciously reflected the dichotomy which exists between manual and mental labor. It thus shows how insidious can be the filtering of cap­italist values.

                        iii.      Ideology - Devasarana was strongest in these terms - at least in theory it had a clear-cut ideology, but naturally there were very tough problems in living up to these ideological demands. Uda-Gira had no ideological base we feel that this was one of its weak points. Serapis too, was ideologically oriented. In Devasarana too, while some fanners are more politically conscious than others – still, it is apparent that it is Sevaka Yohan who is most convinced ideologically. The ideological tensions reveal the pressures of a capitalist society on these new experiments.

                       iv.      Impact on the Surrounding Area - Of the three, Devasarana is most conscious of the need to be integrated with the surrounding villages and also the need for conscientization. The organization of open-air drama and the series of seminars on "Sri Lanka and the Social Revolution" are two attempts by the collective farmers in this process of conscientization. Still Devasarana remains a pocket isolated from the rest of the village where agricultural ownership is concerned.

Also with regard to Devasarana, the swami figure seems to have caught up with the villages more than the ideas of the collective farm itself. This again reveals our traditional attachment to religious personnel.

In conclusion, we wish to state that our experience at these three farms, with Devasarana in particular, has made us realize that the road to socialism is dif­ficult, that old values persist and die hard, but that it is also in the pioneer­ing efforts of these young farmers, however weak, that we can find the seeds of a society which will create a new humanity. Further, we also realize that those en­gaged in these three farms-face problems of the toughest nature which we SCMers are never called to face. So, it shows in short the superficiality of our own work particularly it is not action – oriented.

 

9

 

Japan

Post War Japan can be divided into three periods. The first period was from after WWII to the end of the 40's. This era might be called "democratization" or "de-imperialization" or "de-fascization". It really was democratic. For example, the Emperor was brought down from being a god to a simple symbol.  The Communist Party was made legal and trade unions were formed.

The second period was the Korean War.  There was a change in text­books.  The trend of education shifted from criticism of imperialism to total veering away from it.  The labor situation was also changed. The trade union was suppressed by McArthur after the great labor strike. This was the rebirth of Japanese imperialism. Economic boom came about because of the Korean War. The miserable situation after World War II was changed.

The third period was in the sixties. Japan enjoyed another econ­omic boom because of the Vietnam War. There was a slight change be­tween the sixties and the seventies. Japan had more a free hand in the far – east strategy in the seventies.

The rearmament of Japan has been done quietly and gradually. Japan's constitution, Article 9, forbids the country from possessing an Army.  But in the beginning of the fifties, the Japanese Self Defense forces came into existence.  Since the first five-year Defense Build-up Program began in 1957, the SDF has carried out four five-year plans to build military strength.  The fourth plan will be com­pleted in 1976.  They spent $19 billion in the first, $36 billion for the second, $66 billion for the third, and $154 billion for the fourth plan.  Total expenditure now amounts to 6.4% of the whole national budget.

Under the current fourth plan, the 'select army' has been station­ed and is ready to engage in actual warfare.  This move is related to the reversion of Okinawa to Japan, which means that the operational range of the SDF would expand to an area of 1000 sea miles in radius. Tokyo stands at its center.  It is a tremendous change when you con­sider that, before the third plan began, the defense responsibility of the SDF was limited to the territorial and air within three nauti­cal miles of Japan itself.

There are about 265,000 troops in Japan SDF. The Manpower has not been outwardly increased.  However, the number of ex-SDF officers and soldiers reaches almost 500,000 and the reserve SDF personnel, who are required to train regularly after they are retired, comes up to more than 40,000.  Approximately, 100,000 company employees enlist in SDF every year for a short period of temporary training arranged by various corporations.  So there is a considerably large manpower pool as a whole.

Under the present economic situation, young Japanese cannot easily get jobs in business; so, joining SDF has become more and more an open opportunity for them.

Yamakawa Akio, editor of New Asia News, analyzed the situation in his country regarding nuclear power.  He says that the Japanese govern­ment prefers to possess the high level of technology that enables the possession of nuclear weapons, rather than possessing them.  That is, Japan will have a larger voice in international affairs if it remains the top non-nuclear nation while having the ability to produce nuclear weapons, rather becoming the tenth nuclear power in the world.  The Japanese government calls it 'nuclear option diplomacy’.  Advocates for the nuclear armament certainly exist within the Liberal Democratic Party, but the government believes it more advantageous to ratify the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

 

10

 

TORTURE

“No longer men, but only shadows”.

No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

Thus says Article 5 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. What, however, are the realities of the situation?  To answer this question, let me first of all introduce two acquaintances of mine, John and Paul.

John is a young Brazilian whom I met at an international meeting of students in Switzerland in the summer of 1971.  His story began in September 1969 when he was arrested in Rio.  Immediately upon arrest, a group tried to force him to give information about the National Union of Students of which he was an executive member.  He refused. Then they administered electric shocks all over his body, particularly over sensitive areas.  He was also suspended in mid-air, with hands and feet bound together, and in that position systematically beaten. In addition, there was psychological torture. Twice he was brought before firing squad and told to prepare to die. The rifles clicked but nothing happened. After 8 days, he was put in a small cramped cell and left there in solitary confinement for 55 days. After a year, prison conditions began to improve. This, John firmly believes, was due to the pressure of public opinion, national and international.

Paul comes from another Latin American country.  As a student, he was like John, arrested and asked to pass on information about comrades who held key positions in the national organization to which he belonged.  He was harassed in many ways, but still refused to co­operate.  Among the prisoners was a girl who was pregnant. One day, Paul was confronted with a frightening decision: "Reveal the names or be responsible for the violent removal of the fetus from the girl's womb".  Paul, knew the girl well and discussed the matter with her. She was adamant.  On no account whatsoever must the names be revealed; the consequences for herself she said, were of secondary importance. A few days later official removed the fetus with a sword.  This was a traumatic experience for Paul.  He thought he was going to die, but to his surprise, he was eventually released. His first impulse on release was to go to Mass at the nearest Catholic Church.  When the time came for receiving the Eucharist, he approached the altar to find standing next to him the man who had tortured him in prison. In horror, Paul ran out of the chapel.

How widespread is the practice of torture?  Perhaps the cases of John and Paul are isolated ones?

 

"Epidemic Proportions"

This is the answer given by "Amnesty International Report on Torture" in 1972 as a part of their worldwide campaign for the abol­ition of torture. The report analyzes the situation in 61 countries.

 

Ireland

In early August 1971, the north of Ireland exploded. In a mid­night swoop, hundreds of young men were dragged from their homes and hurried off to internment. I was in Dublin at that time and still remember the shocked and often violent reaction of the people in the North and indeed in the Republic.

Many of the men swept off to internment complained of torture. A Commission spent five days interviewing 30 people. It concluded that, "persons arrested under the Special Powers Act had been sub­jected to brutal treatment".

 

*A digest of an article by James Hurley, S.J., Hong Kong

 

12

 

Russia

Alexander Solzhenitsyn's "The Gulag Archipelago" throws much light on what goes on in Russia prison.  Significantly, the book is dedicated to "those who could not live to tell". One letter of cong­ratulations sent to the author comes from a group of prisoners in another camp: "We are certain that as long as writers like you exist, the teeth-smashing, bone-crushing blow will not become the only form of contact among men".

 

Brazil

Brazil is one of the countries most frequently and vehemently ac­cused of practicing torture.  In June 1970, the International Commission of Jurists called upon the government to allow an international body to investigate the many alleged cases of torture in the country.  The Human Rights Section of OAS and Amnesty International made similar requests; all three were turned down.  In the meantime, a commission of Brazilian bishops produced a document on "Brazil – Torture and Death of Political Prisoners".  The AI Report on Brazil concludes that, "in Brazil a system of maltreatment of political prisoners has become an institutionalized and standard technique of interrogation."

 

Asia

In the distant past torture was used as punishment and also con­sidered part of the judicial process.  Some rudimentary rules governed its use.  In more recent times, there was considerable discussion about the infamous tiger cages of Con Son in South Vietnam.  A former warden of these cages describes how they dealt with particularly recalcit­rant and uncooperative prisoners: "We poured buckets of oil into their cage so that they could not lie down or sleep on the oil-flooded floor.  And since they had to stand day and night in the oil, the prisoners' feet swelled... then rotted... then they died... their groan­ing could be heard miles away in the night."

In the past years, the focus has shifted to the Philippines.  On November 1974, the Archbishop of Manila Jaime Sin gave an interview to members of the foreign press about cases of torture and brutal kill­ing, which he knew.  He provided evidence in the case of Marsman Alvarez whose eye was gouged out and his nose cut off.

On January 9, 1975, a group of bishops, priests and sisters is­sued a manifesto in which they asserted that cases of torture were no longer isolated.  Meanwhile, the military admitted the possibility that some men "may have committed certain excesses in the performance of their duties".

In another Asian country where the practice of torture seems quite common, a priest friend of mine describes visiting a young man released from jail.  "The spectacle is horrifying.  He was par­alyzed and broken as if he had been savagely beaten."  The young man himself refused to speak.  My friend reckons that his silence was the price he had to pay for his release.

The "Amnesty International Report on Torture" mentions seven countries in central and East Asia where there is evidence of the practice of torture.  Other countries they would like to investi­gate but find them inaccessible.  This inaccessibility poses many serious questions.

 

Methods

We have already come across some of these methods:  systematic beating, solitary confinement, electric shocks even on one's geni­tals, intense and prolonged interrogation.  To this list, we could add burns, rape, wallowing in one's excrement...  There is also the psychological torture.  I have mentioned about the case of John who twice was brought before a firing squad but nothing hap­pened. There is also the case of a prisoner who was shown slides of his family while he was being tortured, thus dear ones become associated with his pains.

A former minister in the Allende government attributed his release from a concentration camp to "worked public opinion". In late 1973, the acting president of the Bolivian Justice and Peace Commission stated that there had been a decrease in torture in his country, "thanks to pressure from national and international organizations."

Amnesty International is the one single organization that represents the conscience of the world in this matter of torture and expresses the determination of men of goodwill in eradicating this evil, from our midst.

Although the Churches very often arrive on the scene when the smoke of battle has cleared, there has been in recent years, denunciation and condemnation from groups and individuals in the Church.  These denunciations of the Churches must of course, be translated into effective action.

 

12

 

ANALYSIS

 

A BRIEF ON THE ECONOMICS OF U.S. MILITARISM

 

The entry of the United States into World War II in 1941 brought an end to a decade of economic depression and ushered in a prosperous war economy.  This prosperity was possible only through continued expansion of military production with little regard for its effects internally and abroad.  Military strategies of the US have been fre­quently based not on a realistic appraisal of the global economic and military scene, but on a compulsion to increase military spend­ing.

Three forces – potential political unrest caused by high unem­ployment in the US, a hunger for cheap, abundant raw materials, and a desire to control foreign markets and labor provide a ration­ale for military expansion. These were behind the US involvement in Asia exemplified by Vietnam. US interests were focused here because nationalistic Marxist movements threatened the access of the US, Japan and Western Europe to Malaysia's rubber and tin, and the vast mineral deposits of Indonesia; billions of investments were also at stake.

Capitalist logic of continued military expansion and global domination prevailed over the realistic appraisal of intelligence agents who urged support for Ho Chi Minh on the grounds, that his was a truly popular movement aimed at agrarian reform. This pre­vailed over military logistics experts who said that the US should never attempt to fight a major land war in Asia. For fifteen years, the same logic overruled strong American humanist protests against atrocities committed in Vietnam.

 

The Face of US Militarism

After World War II, the first action of the US was to estab­lish a ring of expensive foreign military bases surrounding both China and the USSR.  In addition to these, the US has kept many physicists, engineers, technicians and construction workers em­ployed at handsome salaries developing an awesome nuclear capability in maintaining global military supremacy.

Some trends in US military thinking characterized by aggres­siveness are strikingly clear.  First, as the relative capacity of the US shrinks while still remaining the dominant military and economic force, she relies more and more on secondary imperial powers such as Iran, Japan, Brazil and Indonesia.  American policy towards Japan calls for a strong military presence to keep Japan weak, to maintain a logistics base and communications net­work in Asia and to continue to protect Asian 'security'.  While Japan is provided with an American nuclear shield, Taiwan is pro­vided with US nuclear reactors, which produce enough fissionable plotinum, to provide Taiwan with a tactical nuclear force.  Indo­nesia is being groomed as a secondary imperialist power and has already made her aggressiveness felt in Portuguese Timor.

Second, the trend of replacing supplies with sophisticated mil­itary equipment is being continued.  Tactical nuclear weapons have been stockpiled. Third, the actions of the US since the overthrow of Thieu indicate a strong intention of remaining in Southeast Asia.  Troops withdrawn from Thailand, the Philippines, and Japan have been re-stationed in Guam and Hawaii.  Ford was quick to as­sure ASEAN nations of the US's intention to maintain a strong mil­itary presence in Asia.  Fourth, the abolition of the draft in the US and the establishment of a 'volunteer' or mercenary army implies different tactics of aggression to be used in the future.

Locally, the U.S. is currently spending much money and effort in training and supplying the police of its allies. The International Police Academy was established to train police in certain key nations such as Iran, Indonesia, Thai­land, the Philippines and others.  Given this reliance on a strong internal police force, and it is clear that the U.S. will increasingly help turn these countries into fascist states where conditions will progressively become repressive.

 

Conclusion

Militarism, both American and Western Europe, has its greatest impact on the workers and peasants in countries closely tied to the international capitalist system.

'Development' as it has been carried out since World War II proved to benefit a small minority and to actually worsen the conditions of those who live at the bottom of the economic scale.  Military expansionism sharpens this inequality to its highest degree. Education and health systems are allowed to stagnate while money is spent on expensive arms.

The strategies for the peoples of Southeast Asia are clear.  The first step is to control the production of primary commodities and to form cartels, since this hits the industrial sector at their weakest point.  At the same time, it is important to develop the ability to provide a viable living for the people with­out external trade.  However, this cannot be done so long as the people are sup­pressed and their voices muted.

 

*Condensed from a paper discussed in the East Asia ALDEC

 

13

 

MILITARIZATION OF POLITICS IN ASIA: THE KOREAN EXPERIENCE

 

Introduction

A strong wave of political repression marked the situation of many Asian countries in the early 70's.  This is expected to conti­nue to rise in years to come, looking into the Asian political sit­uation closely.  Authoritarian political dictatorships in Asia – military or otherwise – reflect the internal contradictions of Asian societies. There are emerging various struggles by the people of Asia to liberate themselves.  Struggles in Vietnam and elsewhere are only the beginnings of a new era of movements for liberation from oppressive powers.

One of the central elements that produce political dictatorship and repression in these countries is the rise of militarism. Without understanding this phenomenon, the nature of the contradictions in Asian societies cannot be grasped. Militarism arises when the mil­itary becomes dominant in politics, economics and even the social life, beyond its traditional roles as armed forces to defend the nation against foreign invasion. The domination of political and economic life by the military, either through direct rule or through military rule in civilian garb, can be defined as militarism. Such military domination has structural implications for society and therefore, it becomes a central element in the social contradictions.

When the military takes command of politics – the politics of economic development – the institutional divisions between politics, economics and military are completely abolished.  A demonic symbiosis rises out of the three institutions usually manifesting itself as an extremely authoritarian dictatorial regime.  This type of regime may achieve a certain degree of economic development in terms of economic growth; but its economic system is operated in a very arbitrary man­ner, which means deepening corruption and acute economic injustice in terms of distribution.  Political development will suffer most of all, in that politics becomes completely militarized in spirit and body. Such militarism will drive the people into an extremely rep­ressive society. The manifestation of this militarism may vary in different societies, but fundamentally, militarism has become the most demonic political reality that man has ever experienced in hist­ory.  Again, the ideology of development in technocratic terms often entails this process of militarization of society, especially in the absence of institutional and political checks. This is frequent­ly the case in Asian and other developing countries.

The penetration of the west into Asian civilizations was a technological one in the foremost sense, a military penetration in the form of military conquest or in the form of adoption of military technology.  One cannot separate the commercial or religious ventures of the Portuguese or Spanish powers or those of the western colon­ial powers in modern times from the technological or military ones. What shocked the Asian societies was not the superiority of western values but that of their military technology and power.

It is not easy to give a general picture of militarization in Asia without oversimplification, because Asian countries are very diverse politically and culturally.  Thus, we have chosen one case – South Korea – familiar to the author, to contribute to the study of this alarming phenomenon of militarism in Asia.

 

*Authored by a researcher of D.A.G.A., Tokyo.

 

Korean Military Coup of 1961

The rise of militarism in South Korea dates from the May 16, 1961 military coup d' etat bu the small military clique of Gen. Park Chung – Hee and Kim Jong – Pil.  This coup overthrew the civilian rule of Premier John M. Chang.  On the same day, Martial Law was declared and formal military rule was established throughout South Korea.

The reaction form the Korean military forces, was one of hesitant and undecisive delay; the army could have easily crushed the new mil­itary regime, which had only 36,000 soldiers.  The reaction from the U.S. was equally undecisive.  It is understood however, that without U.S. support the military regime could not have survived.  It is con­ceivable that the U.S. was aware of the process of the coup, parti­cularly because it was planned and executed by the intelligence of­ficers of the ROK Army headquarters, who should have had close links with American intelligence.

 

Anti-communism Propaganda and the KCIA

Two immediate and distinct features of the military regime were the anti-communist propaganda and the creation of the Korean Central Intelligence Agency (KCIA).

The first article of the pledge by the military regime was:

Anti-communism was not merely the policy of the military regime, but it was the 'rationalization' of the coup and of the power of the mil­itary regime – so much so that even the suppression of freedom and democracy is now rationalized in the name of anti-communism.

Since the military coup had been carried out by a small clique, its first task was to safeguard its precious power.  For this pur­pose, the KCIA was organized on June 19, 1961. The KCIA, enjoying unlimited power, functions as the eyes and ears of Park Chung-hee. It is directly responsible to the President and acts as coordinator of all intelligence activities in the country.

KCIA represents the militarization of the security apparatus and information network of the country.  It has been transformed into a political security and intelligence agency with vast powers to raise funds without audit from the National Assembly to control all the other civilian security apparatus such as police, to coordinate military intelligence networks, to infiltrate all government offices from top to bottom, to penetrate all private organizations such as religious organizations, business corporations and labor unions.

KCIA receives its technical training from the United States and in an important way, it is interlinked operationally with the U.S. CIA operations, just as the military of South Korea is interlocked with the U.S. military.

 

The Militarization of Politics Garrison State

Upon pressure from the United States, Park agreed to concede his power to the civilians, although he wanted to have five more years As a result. Park changed his mantle into that of civilian rule in 1963.  But the change was one of a militarization of civil politics through change of uniform into civilian garb.

About 100 high-ranking military officers retired from active duty to continue their jobs in the government or to run for elective offices. The top leadership of the ruling Democratic Republican Party came from retired military personnel. In addition, all the administrative posts of importance in the central, provincial and local governments were occupied by retired military people.  This was true also for the head positions of the national police bureau­cracy.  The same pattern was found in important government corp­orations.  The process of 'civilianization' was nothing but an empty ritual, not a substantive change in the form of rule.

Then in 1972, Park declared Martial Law and established the so – called Yushin System, another for Garrison State. Threatened by the erosion of his political power base and the rapidly changing international environment, Park decided to suspend all politics and establish a dictatorship.

Under the Yushin system, the President controls virtually all three branches of government, in addition to being Commander-in-chief of the armed forces. The power of the National Assembly is drastical­ly reduced. The Supreme Court is also determined by the President.

Besides the administrative apparatus, Park controls also the cen­tralized police system. The entire population is under semi-military regimentation. All men from high school age to 35 are organized into civilian militia; the people are subject to total military mobilization (women are volunteers) under new legislation.

 

The Military Regime and Economic Development

Korean economic development is characterized by a kind of a capit­alist industrialization, with foreign capital coming in through inter­national loans, public and private, and direct investments, either total or joint ventures. In this process, the industrial sector of the economy has been isolated from the economy of the common people, ex­cept in two ways: first, the people became consumers of those indust­rial products in a very limited way, and secondly, the people were inserted into the industrialization process as cheap labor. In this process, the real sponsor of the Park regime was the foreign capitalist, particularly the multinational corporations.

The Park regime instituted a series of laws such as the labor law, foreign investment inducement law and emergency measures on economy to protect foreign capital. The economy is dominated by the foreign cap­italists on the financial level and the military generals on the cor­poration level.

In such a situation, corruption is not a question of the lack of social and personal discipline and integrity, but is a structural el­ement in the political economy. The people suffer this structural contradiction on the economic level, the underdevelopment of agriculture and other traditional sectors of the economy, and the exploitation of their labor by the multinational corporations under the political and military protection of the regime.

 

Interlocking Military Relationship between Korea and U.S.

There have been three stages in the development of the military interlocking between Korea and United States. The first stage was the phase of U.S. military occupation of Korea and subsequent establishment of the Korean Constabulary, from which ROK Army was organized. The second phase is the period between the Korean War and the Vietnam War. The final and unfolding phase is the post-Vietnam War.

At the end of July 1950, the U.N. Security Council established the U.N. Command in Korea. This effectively put the Korean military under the U.N. Command, which in fact is the U.S. Military Command. This is maintained even now.

This interlocking relationship between two military forces is not merely a form of cooperation and coordination of two forces, but is a strategic integration bet­ween two armies, counter-posed against North Korea, China and the U.S.S.R. The mil­itary integration is virtually total.

The power of the U.S. military forces is much beyond the 40,000 military per­sonnel present in Korea. It also has implications for political and economic dev­elopment. This means that Korean politics and economics are geared not only to the security of Korea, but also to the strategic objectives of U.S. – Japan –Korea collect­ive security, which is in the process of becoming ever more closely integrated.

 

14

 

IBBAGAMUVA STATEMENT

 

We, the participants from Bangladesh, India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka of the Asian Leadership Development Conference program held from 15-27 October 1975 at Ibbagamuva in Sri Lanka unanimously bring out this statement.  We met together to exchange living local experiences of national movements in the light of the in-depth socio-political-economic situation and to gain insights and direction for radical social transformation to which we are com­mitted in our own respective countries.

Our discussions and seminars were preceded by live-in exper­iences of two collective farms and a savodaya developing village to get a feel of the life of the oppressed sections of society. The live-in experience strengthened our solidarity to take us to the front line of the fight for a just and new order resting on fundamental values such as justice, fraternity and human dignity.

"Give us this day our daily bread" still forms part of the Christian daily prayer, though the traditional Christian theology places the world of spirit above all material considerations. This serious distortion of theology poses a great threat to the ushering of a new era where poverty, illiteracy and social backwardness can be removed. Our humble attempt to bring back the historical Jesus Christ and his liberating activity offered a new vision.  We discussed theology in the light of normal human life where everyone has to feed, cloth and shelter himself or herself.  Hence, it is clear to us that the Christian is called upon to align himself with the poor and the exploited.

Notwithstanding more than a quarter century of independence to our sub-continent, the bulk of the population in the sub-continent lead a sub-human subsistence life.  The avowed policy of socialism and development are nothing but social demagogies and effective weapons in the hands of a rich minority to exploit the suffering millions.  The fruits of the policy of the state never filtered down to the downtrodden except a few occasional handouts.  Since the sub-continent mainly depends on agriculture, the question of land is crucial to the problem of poverty.  In our discussions and seminars, we deeply analyzed the unjust agrarian relationships.  The devastating effects of an economic crisis, the rise in prices of essential commodities, growing unemployment, increasing tax burdens, stagnation and destitute wages of agricultural workers, growing indebtedness, hunger and misery are prevalent in the countryside. These express the various symptoms of deepening agrarian crisis in the sub-continent.  The so-far effected agrarian crisis have neither altered the basic land relation nor loosened the semi-feudal fetters on the economy, let alone smashing them.  In some countries, in fact, this strengthened the economic stranglehold of the ruling class over a large section of the population.

All these problems result in the growing awakening of the mass­es to resist the ruling classes; the ruling classes, on the other hand, use repressive measures.  In some of the countries, the ruling classes could no longer suppress the people through parliamentary democratic ways.  They resorted to the ruthless violence and dicta­torial methods leading to fascism.  People can no longer express themselves and the freedom for normal political activity has come to an end.

 

Action

In the above context, we feel and affirm that the following steps should be taken:

1.   a) a permanent research on the form and nature of the society has to be  undertaken.

b) Researches to be made on conditions under emergency.

c) Issue publications.

2.   a) Facilitate orientation and training programs to form and equip cells and         core groups of students, workers and rural youths.

b) Arrange action / reflection camps for the above people.

3.       Pick up issues and involve, if necessary, create issues to induce people for social change.

4.       Create solidarity links with families of political prisoners.

5.       Experiments of collective efforts in rural sector should be encouraged.

6.       Christians, being a minority in the sub-continent, should not be isolated but overcome their minority complex and identify themselves with the aspirations and struggles of the oppressed section of the sub-continent at large.

SOUTH ASIA ALDEC

 

15

 

MORRISON HOUSE STATEMENT

 

The Asian Reality

For centuries now, Asia has been a focus of colonial exploit­ation by Western powers.  Of late, she has increasingly become a major battlefield for superpower hegemony.  A prime source of rich raw materials, Asia is also exploited as a supplier of cheap labor and a dumping round for consumer goods and other inferior surplus products.

Aiding the dominant powers are the local elite who trade the well-being of the majority of their peoples for their own gains.

Because of the exploitative nature of this relationship between the big powers and their neo-colonies, impoverishment is widespread and Asian indigenous development has to be stunted.

Through all these, a history of peasants' and workers' strug­gles has unfolded.  To assert their dignity, they have struggled to uphold their God-given right to be free from foreign and local domination and to determine their own destiny.  The Chinese, the Vietnamese and other Asian people's experiences attest to this.

The reaction of the big powers to the struggles of the people has taken the form of introducing military complexes in the various Asian countries and expanding them through the years.  With the gradual but inevitable awakening of the Asian peoples to their own dignity, the exploiters further develop their military machinery with the primary aim of suppressing the people's struggles.

This complex process of suppression involves: a) the militarization of politics at the expense of human lives; b) the presence of foreign military troops and various forms of military aid; c) suppression of basic human rights; d) suppression of indigenous grassroots movements; e) the introduction of repressive laws; and f) the creation of a false image of the existing order through censorship of media and authoritarian education under the guise of national security to get the nation moving towards development.

This is accompanied by the creation of a military order more awesome than anything the world has seen, which consumes the re­sources of the people while brutally suppressing them.  This war machine crushes the Asian peoples while it brings local regimenta­tion and an artificial temporary prosperity to the superpowers.

 

The Role of the Church in Asian Reality

Although the institutionalized Church has always professed humanitarian aims, its historical role in Asia has been one of identification with and maintenance of the existing economic-pol­itical order.  It has reaped material benefits from that system contrary to the Christian message as manifested in the Christ event, i.e. identification with and participation in the struggle of the oppressed.

In supporting the existing order, the Church has successfully divided the people by establishing elitist schools resulting in cultural alienation by the imposition of Western cultural values. Through this process, the established Church has isolated the Christian community from the greater majority.  Missionary policy was part and parcel of the colonial policy.

At the same time, the Western churches failed to benefit from exposure to traditional collective culture of these societies.  This has fostered a lack of mutual exchange and promoted paternalistic and even racist characteristics in the colonial metropolis.

The traditional emphasis on individual sin and individual salvation refuses to recognize the individual as a functional part of his society and blind to the sins of nations.  Prayer becomes an escape from an active involvement in reconciliation.

Where there is injustice, there is conflict.  A cemeterial kind of peace is often endorsed by the Church in their neglect of focusing on the necessity of struggle for justice.  But peace is not merely the absence of strife.  Rather it is the fruit of justice – and the Church should not escape from the reality of genuine peace.  By neglecting the Christian task of criticizing the established order, missionary efforts simply buttressed the individualistic ideology of capitalism and became almost totally silent on the communitarian message of Christianity which could have complemented and enhanced the inherent and traditional communi­tarian value of the Asian peoples.

The terms "Christian love and peace" no longer denote the radical love of Christ.  They have come to mean the euphoria, which arises when the conflicts, which naturally occur within a community, are unnaturally suppressed through the repression of a segment of the community or are unnaturally transferred to an outside group. This process results in sexism, racism and the continued domination of Asia.

 

Our Response  to the Buenos Aires Statement

In the inability of the Church to break away from the traditional role in the involvement with the established structures, we recognize the appropriateness of the WSCF Buenos Aires Statement, which stresses the need of political involvement of Christians.  More especially in the process of liberation, our Christian witness should become flesh and blood in our daily lives.

It is really that the Church has refused to participate in the people's strug­gles for liberation – therefore, there is no other option for concerned Christians but to identify and involve themselves in the people's struggles.

We express our solidarity with the Christians of South Korea and the Philippines who have paved the way for action.

 

Conclusion

We are now faced with a two-fold task. One is an involvement with the criti­cism of things as they are by means of research, analysis and documentation, with particular emphasis on the role of militarism vis-vis political and economic structures.

The second is the formation of a provisional but not arbitrary alternatives that approximate the Christian ideals of justice and peace.

EAST ASIA ALDEC

 

16

 

REFLECTIONS

 

A CHRISTIAN VIEW OF HUMANKIND AND SOCIETY

It is very difficult to talk of a "Christian" vision of human­kind and society because easily the misunderstanding could arise that Christians have to expound and promote something like a Christ­ian worldview.  The Churches have learnt that this is not their task. If the Incarnation means that God did no longer want to keep him­self separate but communicated his godhead by becoming man, then Christian witness cannot occur in keeping ourselves separate and making a "special contribution".  Our witness will be presence among people, being one with them.  Of course, it is frightening that the price, which Christ paid for his presence among people, was death.  But if the Church was built on the events of Easter and Pen­tecost, the resurrection and the presence of the spirit, we cannot think of these events apart from the price which was paid.  Likewise, while we die ourselves being present among people, we experience that we do not get lost, that this is constant resurrection, renewal and presence of the spirit.  It is in this situation that a Christian vision of humankind and society may always be an immediate response.. to a concrete challenge.  The vision itself is subject to death and resurrection.

It is with this outlook that we may permit ourselves to consult the bible for what sort of vision of humankind and society it may contain.  The result will not be a well-built theological edifice but the remembrance of God acting in history and calling ourselves to act and to live free from fears and reservations.

 

Vision of Mankind

1)       First of all: man is important.  The psalmist makes clear how little we can take for granted: "When I look at the heavens, the work of your fingers, the moon and the stars which you have established, what is man that you are mindful of him? Yet, you have made him little less than God and you crown him with glory and honor. You have given him dominion over the work of your hands you have put all things under his feet."

These are the two ways of expressing the importance of man in the bible.  He is given dominion over the earth, nature, to master it, to tame it, to use it and to replenish it.  This problem lies in the appropriation and distribution of material resources and in the eco­logical crisis, which is rooted in the failure to replenish the earth.

The second way is: God is mindful of man. God remembers.  God wants us to be masters over nature and makers of our own history.  He wants us to be conscious of our past, responsible in our present and creative in building the future.  God remembers. God is mindful means each and every human counts.

2)       God is mindful of all people, but he is mindful of different people in different ways.  That is to say God's relationship with people is never just an inward one which is individualistic, transcending space and time.  It is always a specific relationship, shaped by history, by social relationships, political conditions, by our belonging to a class, a people, a culture.  God never speaks into a vacuum, his words and acts are always concrete.

It is because of this that it is so difficult to obey God’s word

 

*By Gabriele Dietrich, Tamilnadu Theological College, Madurai, India.

 

17

 

in new situations.  We are in the habit of thinking hat God's word us eternal and therefore means the same to all people in all times. But this is an abstraction.  The bible is full of history, cultural and political history.  God's word is new every day.  That means it is ever changing.  God leads his people out of Egypt, but in the times pf the prophet Jeremiah, it is the false prophets who promise the immediate end of the exile.  The true prophet has to read the signs of the times and truthfully interpret them.

While God is mindful of all people, he is particularly concerned with the weak, the suffering, the oppressed, the disabled.  The re­demption of the exploiter will occur in the restitution of justice to the exploited.  There is no doubt that God is partial.  Not because there is an inherent goodness in the weak and the oppressed, but simp­ly because they are not meant to be weak and oppressed.  God's con­cern with the rich man is to liberate him from his wealth... This can happen in an individual way, by change of heart, conversion.  But exploitation will only be ended if structural exploitation is abolish­ed.  Individual conversion does not yet change a society whose driving force is the profit-motive.

3)       God is mindful of women and men and he wants them to be full hum­an beings.  The bible was written in the environment of a society in which women were very much oppressed.  It is therefore not surprising if in the biblical writings a lot of concessions are made to this factual state of affairs.  It is more surprising if finally the message of liberation prevails and turns out to be equally valid for women as for men.

4)       4)God is mindful of human being as sinner.  We often draw the con­clusion that due to the corruption of human nature no real improve­ment is possible; progress in history or building of a more just society will be doomed to fail and, therefore, we can only individ­ually mend our ways and ask for forgiveness from God.  The temptation is to be like God, which is, to set one's own criteria absolute and to claim divine sanction for them.  On the other hand, the bible unceasingly emphasizes that man does know what is right and wrong. To live in the covenant means to live in righteousness.  God – forsakenness means to do injustice.  Repentance is demanded of us.  Finally, the dialectics of man's temptation to be like God and of God being mindful of man is fulfilled and redeemed in the incarnation.  Man is now called to be like God who bent down and became man: The Suffer­ing Servant.  To follow the suffering servant means ceaseless self-criticism, but by no means does it imply passivity and acceptance of injustice or of existing power and structure.  To follow the suffering servant means judgment upon our self-righteousness but at the same time, it means conflict with the vested interests and the powers that be.

5)       God does not protect those who obey him but he promises salva­tion.  The very story of Christ's life testifies that God does not protect those who obey him.  There is always a terrible risk in­volved, which we cannot evade.

The bible has the superb-ness to see that the wicked trap the weak like lions but finally the swords are meant to be transformed into ploughs, and sheep, and lion to live in peace.  To be on the way to achieving this goal means to follow Jesus on the road to Jerusalem, which ends in the road of the cross.  Since the goal is salvation, wholeness, the wiping away of all tears, we are not al­lowed to inflict any needless suffering and sacrifices neither on others nor on ourselves.  But we must also acknowledge that the Christian concern for self-preservation and security is incompatible with discipleship.

 

A Christian Vision of Society?

A Christian vision of society very much evolves out of the Christian vision of man. Since man’s relationship with God does not evolve apart from the socio – political context, society has an influence on this relationship and can in turn, be affected by it.

In fact, God expects us to live his justice in society, which at times, seems to an impossible task. We can therefore draw some tentative outlines of a Christian vision of society.

1)       We are supposed to build a society as if people matter. We live in a society where about 60% of the population live below the poverty line. While 75% of the people live in the countryside, 80% of all doctors and 90% of the hospital beds are concentrated in the cities. The basic amenities of life like food, shelter, clothes, health and education are withheld from the broad majority of people. The gap bet­ween the rich and the poor is widening. How can people master nature and build their future if they are not in a position to organize themselves?

The bible envisages a society in which everyone has access to the essentials, where private property of land is abolished, exploitation is overcome, where people tend their vineyards and fig trees and rest in their shadows, where the weak are protected, the old sit in the marketplace and watch the children playing. While this is an eschatological vision, it is taken as a rod to measure the existing society. A society in which people matter cannot be given unqualified growth arid competition, it cannot be guided by the profit motive, it cannot tolerate usury and luxury consumption. It cannot tolerate the curbing of people's participation and the domination of the masses by an elite.

2)       The bible does not sanction any existing society as divinely ordained. Israel, first guided by charismatic leaders, was ruled by judges for a long period and when it institutionalized kinship, this is described with considerable problem consciousness. Even the most outstanding kings like David and Solomon were punished when they commit injustice. The writings of the prophets are full of sharpest cri­ticism against unjust regimes. At the same time, even foreign rulers like Cyrus can be used in God's plan. Thus, the reading of God's plan requires the careful reading of the signs of the times. The concept of God's kingship has anarchistic implications. Any worldly power is only a substitute for God's kingship and when it does not handle the power responsibly, it falls under judgment of usurpation. Ba­sically, it was the understanding, which sustained the Confessing Church in Germany under Fascism and which gives Filipino Christians the courage to keep struggling.

3)       The bible does not provide any blueprint for political action. While there is a vision of a just society, we do not get any clear instruction on how to achieve it. This has to do with the imminent sense of history expressed in the bible: each new situation requires new strategies. History is always an open process. Besides, the bible has a basically secularist approach. While God is the Lord over creation and history, both nature and history are given into man's hands. Neither the forces of nature nor any forms of government are invested with any divine power. This means that the bible cannot be a manual for understanding soci­ety. We can only gather from the bible what man and society are meant to be. What they really are and how they can be changed we have to study by all the scientific methods at our disposal.

4)       The coming of God's kingdom affects society. In the ”Our Father”, we connect the coming of God's kingdom with the doing of his will. This does not mean that our deeds could bring about the kingdom but it means that our deeds should express his coming. The wiping away of all tears, the breaking of the sting of death is inconceivable in our times. Yet, the protest against suffering and death is some­thing we can express and live here and now. And living this protest is not just an individual affair. The kingdom is described as a society in which all share plenty and all exploitation is overcome. The new Jerusalem will neither be ruled nor will it have a temple, because God will dwelt in their midst. In this, the bible comes very close to the idea of the withering of the state and of religion. All worldly and religious authority is questioned and put to task in this light. In the light of the kingdom we are called to repent not only our individual sin but our corporate sins: to revise the unjust structures which are in danger of stabil­izing. Witnessing to the kingdom means at least to make signs of its coming visible.

5)       The communio viatorum is called to be a community in permanent revolution. God's person is on the way. God himself pitches his tent among the people. Even after the settlement of the recalling of the exodus is a reminder of the transitoriness of all settlements. In the New Testament, the symbols of dissolution and penetration prevail: leaven, salt, mustard seed.

This does not mean that Christians cannot be involved in power struggles. They have to be if they really try to take sides with the weak and the oppressed whose liberation can only be achieved through struggle. Of course, much too often they have been involved even on the side of the oppressors. But if they truly follow Christ, they will not cling to power for the sake of power, but they will refrain from becoming oppressors. This does not mean that we are allowed to be politically naive and moralistic. We have to be sober in our political analysis and strategies but also have to be sober about our roles. We will be marginal, we won't be in the centres of power and we won't be the vanguard of the revolution. Yet we may be in­volved in overthrowing oppressors, in building a just society, being present among the people as salt and leaven, witnessing to the kingdom, which comes and is present in the pain and joy of anticipation. We will see the people celebrate their vic­tories with trembling and know they are ever on the way. We will see the people resign in despair and know there is hope. We will know that any exertion of power requires forgiveness and renewal.

 

18

 

CHRISTIAN WITNESS AND THE PROBLEM OF POWER

 

In any social interaction, power is exercised.  On a national or even a regional level, power partakes of directions and decisions, affecting and influencing people: social, cultural, economic and pol­itical power.  Our days of study here have pointed to one stark real­ity: that the life and fate of many Asian nations is decided by a combination of power play between the military, the technocrats and international and national political elites.

There are no two ways about it: power is a reality we must con­tend with. We commit the mistake of thinking that in itself power is evil.  This, not withstanding the fact that there are manifestations of power, which are evil or power being used by persons for evil pur­poses.  Power becomes evil when those who hold it make it so.

Power can be good – it can be used for the good.  If economic power, for example, instead of being used for military purposes were used for the causes of justice and peace – then human life can be transformed and the quality of life be improved.

Look at the regional scene.  What is the concept of political power in Asia?  In many Asian nations, power is seized by those who maneuver themselves on to the saddle.  Once they are there, they manage to maintain themselves in power via constitutional fiat or military takeover subverting the people's political will.  General­ly, the powerful of Asia are those backed also by the superpowers who deliver military and technological aid.

The burden of our reflection this morning is to speak on what the Christian witness is to the problem of power.

We can start with power as it is talked about in the Old Testa­ment.  Israel was a small nation always overpowered by the bigger ones during those days.  But, in the accounts of the Bible, we find many instances when Israel prevailed against those big nations.  At one point, Egypt was virtually ruled by a young man named Joseph who used some kind of spiritual power, moral suasion, to see to it that Israelites were protected.  Moses confounded the strength of Egypt in a military chase over the desert in which the Israelites triumphed.  Solomon, singly, prevailed over many because of his wisdom; David as a lad overcame the  strength of a Goliath.

This idea is succinctly put in a verse in Isaiah 40:29, which says, "He gives power to the faint, and to him who has no might he increases strength."

The New Testament witnesses to this as well.  Our Lord displayed an unusual source of power and strength.  At one point, he said that one should not fear those who kill the body but those who kill the spirit.  Inspired by his message and his example, the band of dis­ciples, though small, were instrumental in spreading the good news of their Lord.  Again, it is moral suasion that is able to both tem­per the holders of power and encourage the weak to seek strength in the spirit and not by sheer might.

Coming back to our present world and time and analyzing our sit­uation in the light of this vision, we can look at instances and historical events, which demonstrate the triumph of power by spirit and not by might.

Stories out of Vietnam at the height of the war have witnessed to the fact that American soldiers were discouraged at their own performance and were amazed at the spirit or will to fight of the Vietnamese farmer / soldiers.  Not all the fire power or technological know-how of a great empire could subdue the will of a people to be free.  The Vietnam­ese were fighting more than a war – they were fighting for their own liberation from centuries of bondage under the Chinese, then the Japanese, and now the Americans. The rest is history.... This conception of power as spirit has been demonstrated in the will of a people!

It is a big mistake for Christians to think and act that only they possess this spiritual power or moral suasion.  It is beginning to appear more and more that spiritual reservoir – this strength of and from the people – emanates from a moral spring from those whom we often call as having a godless ideology and politics.

Christians can and should provide a witness to the problem of power drawing from the Scriptures and reading correctly the signs o-f the times if they are to enter man's open future.

 

*Nael Cortez, 3 December, 1975, East Asia ALDEC

 

19

 

THE PARABLE OF THE WICKED HUSBANDMEN*

(A political bible study)

 

Ref. Mark 12:1-12; Matt. 21:33; Luke 20:9-19; Gospel of Thomas logion 65.

 

1.       Most of liberal commentators treat this parable as a religious allegory. In terms of straight Biblical exegesis, the parable is not an allegory.  Allegory creeps into the parable through the explicit references to Isa. 5:1-7.  Now Isa. 5 clearly talks about Israel in the parable of the vineyard, but the allusions to this passage depended on the Greek text of the O.T.  Since Jesus spoke Aramaic, the insertion of Isaiah must be due to a later tradition.  This has been confirmed in the discovery of the parable in the Gospel of Thomas.

2.       Once the Synoptists have rooted the parable in the allegory derived from Isaiah, they let the religious allegorizing take over the whole parable.  The allegorizing takes place according to the political theology of each of the writers:

a)       The servants – The servants of the parable become the prophets.  Mark writ­ing from Rome for Romans has a whole series of servants sent, all of whom, maltreat­ed, some killed and one wounded.  This strange detail is probably a reference to the beheading of John the Baptist.  So Mark includes John as one of the prophets.

Matthew, writing for the Jewish Christian Church in Jerusalem after the sack­ing of the city and the virtual collapse of all Jewish resistance but in their growing resistance against Pharasaic Judaism, is fond of periodizing the prophets into earlier and later prophets.  Thus, the two sets of servants in the story.

Luke, writing for the upper classes of the Roman Empire, is the literary styl­ist of the three.  He reacts against the crude allegorizing and has three single servants sent, none of whom are killed.

b)      The Son – Once the vineyard becomes Israel, the tenants, the leaders of Israel, and the servants the prophets, so the 'beloved son' becomes Jesus.  In Mark, the son is killed and then thrown out of the vineyard.  The implication is that Jesus was killed by the Romans whose practice was to kill rebels in the Jewish cities and then throw the bodies out where they could be collected by relatives. Matthew and Luke were aware of this implication.  So, in their version the tenants first take the son out of the vineyard and there kill him.  This means close in­volvements by the Jews in the murder.  The 'white-washing' of the role of the Rom­ans as mere pawns in a clever Jewish plot, spearheaded by the Sadducees and Herodians, is clearly the political philosophy of the Gospel writers.

c)       The fate of the tenants – Following Mark, all three Gospels end their parable with the Sadducees wanting to arrest Jesus because they realized Jesus was talking about them – in the fate of the tenants who ended up without the vineyard.  For Mark and Luke He would give it to the Gentile Christians and for Matthew to the Jewish Christians.  We can't take this ending seriously because of its dependence on Isa. 5 and the fact that it is absent from Thomas' account.

3.       When we turn from the Synoptics, we find what is easily recognizable as the same parable in the Gospel of Thomas, but without the politically based allegorizing. Here, it is apparently the quite shocking story of a successful murder. The beauty of this quite 'immoral' story is that the tenants decide to kill the heir for pure­ly materialistic ends.

Given our assumption of the political rooting of religion, we search for its meaning in clues in political economics.  From even the conservative / liberal schol­ars, we find that at that time large estates were owned in the main by absentee landlords, which caused agrarian discontent to go hand-in-hand with nationalist feelings.  In these circumstances, it was inevitable that the absentee landlords would have continual trouble with their tenants refusing to pay rent.  The local administration did little or nothing to protect the land rights in the colonies of their citizens.  They even allowed the old Jewish law to stand in Palestine, which stated that of landowner died without heirs, then the property fell to the tenants.  This political and economic context would have obviously encouraged the sort of abuse and murders we find in Thomas' version.

Thus the story in Thomas is easily credible in the circumstances of those people.  An absentee landlord in those troubled times, is forced to take a rather ineffectual action to claim his rent.  The peasant tenants were able to treat the servants with gross disrespect, a disrespect, which the rich man is totally unable to comprehend.  So, he says, 'perhaps they did not recognize my servant and then surely they will respect my son’.  But clearly, the tenants had recog­nized the servant and had no intention of respecting the son and heir.  Their nationalist sentiments told them that this was their land, and they deeply resented foreign domination, both in politics and land ownership.  They knew what to do and they did it.  They killed the heir of the usurping landlord.

At this point, and without further comment, except the significant and typ­ical, 'whosoever has ears, let him hear’, the parable ends. Significantly, Jesus neither praises nor condemns the fiction of the tenants.

In that day and age there is simply no point in denying the- obvious political implications of such a parable. It certainly sounds like a call to revolt for the people of the land to throw off their tenant status in the land of their fathers. In the least, the parable paints a picture of a Jesus who is fully aware of the politics and economics under which he and his people were compelled to live and here we find him neither condemning nor praising the rather disorgan­ized activities of the disinherited peasants against their absentee masters.

 

*By Basil Moore, Adelaide College of Advanced Studies, Australia, a lecture given to the NZSCM Summer Conference 1975 (The Ark, No. 3, 1976)

 

20

 

JUDGEMENT AGAIN AT PERADENIYA*

 

The students have erupted again.

Now top people are negotiating

the exact nature of the punishment

that must be meted out to them, the students.

But what about the President  of the Campus?

Evidently, so students swear, he used to go about

referring to female students as prostitutes

and uttering other such inanities

about student behavior and misbehavior

no ideas at all how to communicate with students.

Who is going to judge Him, the President?
What punishment should be meted out to him?

Evidently, the previous outburst of the students was so outrageous

sex and all that

(what about investigating the private sex life – sundry affairs,

masturbation fantasies, etc. –

of Presidents and other such whited sepulchers?)

that it was sufficient excuse for promulgating special commissions,

to curb those savages (students not Presidents).

From time to time our society has recourse

to Ayub Khan methods

(yesterday Ayub Khan today Indira tomorrow Sirima?)

It just shows of what stuff we are made

our democracy is a thin veneer

(who are the savages?)

And various top people say:

at last, we have out our foot down now,

at last we have gotten the situation under control.

What a hope!

When will we learn?

The students put up with those rules and regulations

for a few months (was it three or four?)

Then they simply went and gave the President a bit of their mind

quite right, of course

and the President lost his temper and so did they, no doubt,

or something like that anyway, for there was no possibility of communication,

a great big gap between students and President

and a big rumpus ensued, students remanded,

students suspended, exams postponed.

But the President, the main culprit,

who is going to judge Him?

and other Professors and Lecturers?

Who will judge them?

Who will judge Us? Our Society?
that is, those who have wielded power and wield power now?

When will we be ready for a workers and peasants government?
where power will be predominantly in the hands of workers and peasants,

no great big gap between leaders and people

a government in dialogue

directly responsible, directly answerable

at every level to workers and peasants,

and students too, yes students too,

students WILL have their say!

Then Presidents and other top people will be sent

to collective farms to taste

not necessarily blood but certainly toil, tears and sweat.

Priests will be de – frocked, disrobed

and put to clean lavatories

and they will learn the worth, the value of workers,

peasants and students

the great big gap will close.

Judgment again at Peradeniya!

Who are the judges?

Who are the judged?

 

*By Yohan Devanada. (From The Nation, 3 February 1976)

 

21

 

OUT OF THE MOUTH OF BABES....

 

“My name is Linda. my mother’s name is Salmah. my father’s name is Said Zahari. i am already 13 years old but i haven’t felt my father’s kisses, i haven’t been cuddled by him. because at the time i was born, my father was imprisoned. when i visit my father in prison i can only speak to him throguh a telephone. we are not allowed to be close.

i would like to thank everyone for remembering me, my mother, my sister, my brother and also my father”.

     thank you

 

The voice of Linda, the daughter of Said Zahari speaks on behalf of all children of political prisoners in Asia. Said Zahari has been detained for 13 years in Changi Jail, Singapore, without an open trial.

These words were spoken by Linda herself in Malay and Chinese at the Human Rights Convention in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 15 February 1976.

 

“nama saya linda. nama emak saya salmah. nama bapa saya said zahari. saya sudah berumur 13 tahun tapi saya tak merasa dapat chiuman dari bapa, saya tak pernah ditimang oleh bapa. sebab masa saya melawat bapa saya ditempat dia ditahan, saya hanya bercakap dengan bapa melalui talipon, kami tak dibenarkan dehat.

saya mengucapkan berbenyak terima kasih kepada pakchik – pakchik semua kerana ingathan saya, emak saya, kakak saya, abang saya dan juga ayah saya”.

terima Kasih.

 

 

-Pages 22-29 are continued pages-

 

 

30

 

NEWS BITS

 

PAN ASIAN ASSEMBLY – WSCF / IMCS – 1976

Pan Asian Assembly, a joint conference between International Movement of Catholic Students (IMCS – PAX ROMANA) and World Student Christian Federation (WSCF) in Asia was held at the Tsung Tsin Youth Center in Taipo, New Territories, Hong Kong on May 13 – 22, 1976. The theme adopted by the assembly was: “The Struggle for Self – Reliance in Asia Today”. Some eighty – five delegates were in attendance varying from students, student workers, workers, and workers among farmers and industrial workers across Asia. There were Roman Catholics, Protestants, Buddhists and Moslems among them.

The major paper on the theme was written by Dr. K. Matthew Kurian, Director of the Indian School of Social Sciences in Trivandrum, India and a former member of Parliament representing the Kerala state. He was not able to acquire his travel papers on time so that Bishop Leo Nannayakara of Sri Lanka was asked to present his paper along with his own thoughts on the subject. Reactors to the Kurian paper were Dr. Feliciano V. Carino, General Secretary of WSCF and Priyanthi Perera, a student and member of the Asian Team for South Asia of IMCS. Participants had a regimen of seminars, workshops and field trip along with sharing of personal experiences. Three liturgies were organized during the assembly voicing the aspirations of Asian youth and students. A summary of proceedings will be reported in the next issue of PRAXIS. Later in the year, a booklet will be produced jointly by WSCF & IMCS on the papers and other documents of the assembly.

 

WSCF ASIA COMMITTEE MEETS

Building from the foundations laid by the 1974 Asia Committee, the Committee met for four days following the PAN ASIAN ASSEMBLY at Morrison house on Hong Kong island, May 24-27. Eleven affiliate movements were present from Australia, Fiji, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, New Zealand, Pakistan, Singapore, Sri Lanka and Thailand. Burma, Korea and the Philippines were unable to send their representatives. Hong Kong, an associate member, served as host to the committee.

Voted in as new members are: Bangladesh and Papua New Guinea as associate members and the Koreans in Japan (National Youth Council of the Korean Christian Church in Japan) was voted in as corresponding member. In attendance were Fely Carino of the Geneva Secretariat, Placide Bazoche of Frontier Internship program, Ron O’ Grady and Lee Soo Jin of CCA, and others. Re – elected to serve for another two years are Nael Cortez of the Philippines and Supardan of Indonesia. The regional office will continue in Bangkok with Hong Kong as alternate site. Two new programs approved are: Three – Year Integrated Development of WSCF & IMCS and the Asian Secretaries Formation (ASFOR).

 

WSCF / IMCS PARTNERSHIP


A Three – Year Program on Integrated Development in Asia was approved by the Asia Committee of WSCF and the Pan Asian Conference of IMCS which met separately after the PAN ASIAN ASSEMBLY. The program has as its thrust liberating education and allied projects geared towards the need for liberation. The program was first discussed lengthily during the PAA. It will now be up to the staffs of IMCS and WSCF in Asia to work out the details and the instruments for cooperation and implementation of the program. In any case, it will not be that soon that the program will be on.

 

ASIAN SECRETARIES FORMATION

ASFOR or Asian Secretaries Formation was approved by the Asia Committee as part of the new thrust of WSCF in Asia. It was submitted by the regional staff for approval coming from what they see as the need in the region in the coming years. ASFOR seeks to assist national movements in the training and formation of SCM secretaries and other SCM leaders. Its format is a four – pronged study on politics, theology, formation (spirituality and secularity), and administration. It will involve all eighteen movements across Asia and its venue will change from year to year. It is the successor to ALDEC on Leadership development.

 

31

 

SOUTH PACIFIC SECRETARY VISITS

Marshal Fernando traveled through his area during the months of February through April winding up his two – year term with WSCF. His itinerary covered New Hebrides, Solomon Islands, Papua New Guinea, Wellington, Sydney, Brisbane, Canberra, Melbourne, Adelaide and Perth. He met not only SCMs but groups which are involved in various forms of peoples’ organizations. His main objective was to interpret the rationale and thrust of the PAN ASIAN ASSEMBLY and to invite them to support it. His trip to Australia this time was meant to help ASCM to establish links with other movements concerned with liberation in the country.

 

PAPUA NEW GUINEA – NEW SCM

A group of concerned students at he University of Papua New Guinea ought an associate membership with WSCF and got it during the meeting of the Asia Committee. The PNGSCM was originally a group in the university which had been in touch with the South Pacific office since 1974. in December, one of their members participated in the East and Southeast Asia ALDEC in Hong Kong and Thailand respectively. Through that contact, Aides Wainzo and his group made a pleas to be known as the PNGSCM.

 

BANGLADESH – NEW SCM

Bangladesh SCM used to be part of the Pakistan SCM before cessation but has not been organized as such until Supardan, our South Asia Secretary worked with them to realize this goal. During the Asia Committee meeting they were voted in as a new movement for Bangladesh under the associate category. They expect to inaugurate the national SCM in August this year.

 

CONSULTATIVE GROUP MEMBERS

A precedent – setting action was made by the Asia Committee which met recently: A person from Oceania who is also a student was elected as Chairperson of the Asia Committee in the person of Peter Denee, a lawyer from New Zealand. Peter also serves as Chairperson of the New Zealand SCM. Other members of the Consultative group are: Sarit Tangtrakulpaisan of Thailand was elected Vice Chairperson, Chikara Oshima of Japan and Ameen Paul of Pakistan as Members. The first two are students and Mr. Paul is the Chairperson of the Pakistan SCM.

 

SOUTH ASIA SECRETARY TRAVELS

Supardan has traveled to his area earlier this year. He has drummed up support for Pan Asian Assembly and explained to the movements its thrusts and objectives. The following are excerpts from his report:

India  - The national staff of SCM of India met recently for orientation on strategy, information and implementing of program. Inputs were on Indian society and the role of the Church in it. The bible study was taken from Amos. The orientation was held at the same time the office building was inaugurated. There were thirteen area secretaries present and five national staff.

Pakistan – On March 21st, the National Executive Committee of Pakistan SCM met to make decisions on a building project, camp and conferences, etc. Peshawar SCM conducted health community service program for slum people initiated by medical students. Karachi unit reported a seminar on indigenous pharmaceutical ingredients in implementing non – formal education of Paulo Friere.

Sri Lanka – The major function of SCM this year is the annual conference on the theme: “Christianity in Society Today” held May 13-18. A Working Committee has been set up to organize the forthcoming General Assembly of WSCF which will be held in Colombo, January – February, 1977. the group was to meet with Fely Carino, General Secretary and Ms. Mercy Odoyeye, Chairperson.

 

EAST ASIA AND HUMAN RIGHTS

Recent spates of arrests and trials have put Korea and the Philippines on the spot again in international press reporting.

We continue to receive appeals for solidarity for friends from the two countries and the safeguarding of their rights. We call on you to do your bit in expressing your concern to victims of violations of human rights.

 

PAST ASIA SECRETARIES’ DOINGS

Kentaro Shiozuki, past Asia Secretary was installed as the new General Secretary of the National Committee of YMCAs in Japan. WSCFAsia Office sent a letter of solicitations for him on this occasion.

Moon Kyu Kang, past Asia Secretary also was recently elected the Chairperson of the Korean Youth Council, which is a coalition of all youth movements in South Korea.

 THANK YOU for the support you are giving for PRAXIS and also our first book Peasant Theology. We have received quite a number of gifts for PRAXIS to continue.