77
CAUCUSES
The holding
of women and men caucuses is a regular part of WSCF A-P programmes. It was the
first time to include this process in the joint CCA-WSCF programme.
The separate
caucuses were meant to provide time and space for women and men, respectively,
to be themselves; to share their experiences, sentiments and thoughts of
women's oppression; to raise awareness about women's situation; and to
encourage deeper reflection and critical analysis of women's issues in the
light of all human struggles.
Two separate
caucuses were held, each followed by a joint session where the two groups
shared and exchanged what transpired in their own groups. Following is the
summary of what was shared in the caucuses and the joint sessions.
The women's
caucuses proceeded with each one highlighting one or two issues affecting women
in their respective countries:
78
The women
participants came up with some affirmations as well as suggestions for
realizing women-men partnership:
* Women and men are equal
based on their common rights as human beings.
* There is a need to
re-educate women so that they can build up their confidence and overcome their
inferiority.
* Women still need to be aware
of their situation and problems, of being oppressed because of class, race,
social norm or religion.
* Women must affirm and assert
their rights; they must raise questions and challenge the society to be aware
of their plight.
* Educate men on women's
issues – e.g. housework is not only women's responsibility.
* Women do not know what men
really think of women's issues as they don't speak up. If they can only share
their thoughts more openly, then we can hope to move on towards women-men
partnership.
* In other conversations, men
tend to talk more than women. Men should try to be more sensitive to women's
feelings.
* Women and men should re-read
the Bible with new and critical perspective.
* Why do men always think of
big issues – e.g. the economic, political issues and stuff that are not really
close to their personal life?
79
The first
men's caucus proceeded with each participant sharing personal thoughts about
women's issues, women's oppression, women's situation. It must be noted that
this process is still 'new' to most men. In fact at certain points, the
discussion became difficult as the men held different views and were at
different levels of awareness about women's issues. Below is just a summary of
thoughts shared by different members.
* Men still feel uncomfortable
to talk about women's issues may be because of their early socialization – that
men and women are different and hence are treated differently.
* Women's liberation connotes
such Western acts as bra burning and lesbianism.
* Men generally do not want to
lose power of domination over society; thus, they do not want women to
challenge them – they would prefer women to sit in the home and perform duties
of housewives that social norms require. Men have dominated society for a long
time; so it is not good for them to share power with women as it may cause them
to lose their identity. Thus, even in the leadership of the SCM which advocates
women-men partnership, there are actually very few women compared to men.
* One reason why it seems
difficult for men to share about women's issues may be that they do not know
and are not suffering or experiencing the oppression women are going through.
Men need to recognize that it is they who cause the oppression and so if change
is to be desired, men's attitudes must be reformed.
* Women's issues cannot just
be pinned down to the clamor for equality which is nothing but a number game.
Ensuring equal number of women and men in organizations or positions does not
necessarily lead to a change of women's situation (especially if sexual
harassment, violence against women and commercialization of women's bodies
continue).
* The struggle for equality
between women and men also connotes power struggle. And often times, to try to
level up to positions usually held by men (e.g. president or prime minister),
women have to double themselves up to the "men's standards" hence
affirming a system and values which have been established through patriarchy.
80
* Taking women's issues in the
light of Christ's teachings, it seems the main thrust is that of women-men partnership.
And this is not to recover female integrity, dignity and sovereignty at the
expense of men. Both women and men are in fact oppressed by the social norms.
They therefore need to join hands.
* Women's issues are usually
approached from the socio-cultural perspective. Because it is part of the whole
national issue, there is a need to analyze it from the economic-political angle
as well. On the whole, women's issues are part of the national issue. Women's
rights can only be realized if the national struggle for genuine democracy is
won.
* Using the economic-political
analysis, we find that the women of the lower class are also being oppressed by
women of the upper class. This analysis however only underscores the fact that
women of the lower class are doubly oppressed – by the men (of all classes) and
the women of the upper class.
* Women's issues have also
posed a challenge to fundamentalist interpretation of biblical teachings and
the languages used in the Christian faith.
The second
men's caucus developed on the first whereby issues were highlighted from the
first caucus for further discussion. Following is a summary of the discussion:
(a) On the issue of prostitution
and commercialization of women's bodies. On the surface, prostitution and
sexist advertisements seem to be acceptable – with both parties, the buyer and
seller, seemingly satisfied with the exchange of money with pleasure. But does
this make the relationship right? Is this the way men and women should relate?
Women find this form of relationship disgusting and offensive. The use of other
people for personal pleasure is not the kind of relationship Jesus taught. This
issue can be seen as both economic (poverty) and moral.
(b) On the issue of inclusive
language. This issue is always talked about in ecumenical meetings like this.
It is like discussing the same issue, only in different groups. We need to
"firm" the ground for discussion by expressing our solidarity with
women by making something like a declaration of solidarity. We also need to
change our language – even that used in our prayers – e.g. from "Father,
Son and Holy Spirit" to "Creator, Saviour and Sustainer" or
"Maker, Christ and Holy Spirit" or even come up with a new version of
the Lord's Prayer which should be used in SCM/CCA.
81
(c) On the Issue of sexual
harassment. Is our response, as men, to sexual harassment simply to refrain
from acts which offend women? But what constitutes sexual harassment? Who
should and how do we define sexual harassment? We should know what the root
cause of sexual harassment is. In some places laws are being enacted to protect
men and women, and to prevent sexual harassment. More than that, however,
educating people will not only reduce the effect but even the cause.
(d) On the issue of education. We
need to educate ourselves on the question of equal partnership in all aspects.
Education can change the thinking of men, bring new values, and bring about
awareness which can help to break down the building blocks of patriarchy.
(e) On the issue of partnership.
When women share their stories, they share a common story of suffering and
oppression, of being downtrodden. It is important for men to hear these stories
of women and to realize that we ourselves are related to the sufferings of
women, if not the cause. We should examine ourselves to see in what way we have
contributed directly and indirectly to the misery of women. For true
partnership to occur, we must repent – be de-programmed of the patriarchal
system and be re-educated with new values. Discussions on men-women partnership
must also make practical and concrete suggestions for follow-up action.

82

The joint
session started off with the report of the previous men's caucus. After this the
women presented their brief report and then posed a question to the men:
"How do you personally feel on the issue of women"?
Some of the
men spoke very openly and sincerely and wanted to change their attitude towards
women. They also wanted to know how they can contribute to the process of
change. They realize that women are being oppressed and that they are part of
the system which perpetuates this oppression. They are aware of the fact that
they often hurt women unconsciously and overlook their needs and would like to
be reminded when they do so.
However, one
male participant expressed that "he had lost all conviction" and felt
that women are wanting more than they deserve. He even said that he found the
women's movement "irrational".
After the
sharing session by the men, many women reacted and responded to the various
statements. Some men made references to the creation episode in the Bible. The
women responded by saying they are dissatisfied with the present interpretation
and understanding of the Bible, since it was written by men living in a
patriarchal system.
A general
sentiment was that the women's issues have often been discussed in ecumenical
programmes but there has been very little effort to build a common base from
which we could start. It was felt more and more concrete steps should be taken
in this matter.
To achieve
partnership between men and women requires balance. Women should not always
point an accusing finger at men as "sinners". Men should not wait for
women to point out their faults – they should try to realize their own faults.
83
It was
mentioned that men and women when dealing with such issues find themselves in
difficulty conflict and pain. The underlying tensions and emotions that were
seen at the caucus are a product of previous experiences. We often talk about
liberation, struggle and oppression but these social issues are not merely at
the national and international level but even in our midst it is a painful
realization. But we must integrate these issues with the new socio-political
vision.
