1

 

PREFACE

 

There have been many valuable traditions in the ecumenical movement, one of which is the creative lay initiatives of the World Student Christian Federation, which proved to be one of the cutting edges of the ecumenical movement. To be sure, many of the members of the Student Christian Movement have moved on to serve the churches in many capacities. However, the WSCF and the SCMs retain their own character and it is important that they remain distinctly as a movement of the laity.

One of the distinct contributions of Asian SCMs within the framework of the ecumenical movement was recruitment and training of the ecumenical leadership. It has been criticized by some churchmen for the domination of the ecumenical agenda by particular orientation of SCM trained ecumenical personalities. Nevertheless, it cannot be denied that even the Christian Conference of Asia owes its origin and formation to those who were trained and nurtured in the ethos and theological moorings of the Student Christian Movement.

The relationship between EACC/CCA and WSCF-Asia has always been one of mutual challenge and collaboration. Due to the personalities involved in both bodies, many things were taken for granted.

The trend of regionalization within the once Europe-centered ecumenical world bodies made a formal dialogue between WSCF and EACC on the terms and rationale of cooperation necessary. This led to a joint consultation between them in 1966. After some happy initial years, the cooperation dropped to a bare minimum in the 70s. There were many reasons for this development. The Tao Fung Shan consultation enumerates these, but more significantly it reaffirms the basic conviction and covenant of 1966, viz; the WSCF and the CCA should together attempt to fulfill their common ecumenical responsibilities in the university world in Asia.

 

2

 

One of the important recommendations from this consultation, addressed to the both organizations, is that they recognize the pressing need to analyze critically the present state of university education in Asia, and do together whatever is necessary to strengthen the SCM in each Asian country, and that in so doing they ought to look very closely at the work with and among our university teachers. Under the obligations of Christian mission in our lands, the Church and its members in the academic community have mutual responsibilities proper to their vocation of each. Each will be the poorer without the contribution of the other. This, in fact, is the conviction that prompted the CCA and the WSCF to come together in the Tao Fong Shan consultation.

The success of this timely consultation owes much to everyone who was there, and particularly to the Rev. Harry Daniel, a former Associate General Secretary of the CCA, and a former staff of WSCF who ably chaired the sessions, the main speakers, preachers who inspired us with meditation, those who drafted the reports till the early hours of the morning and, finally, to the Rev. David Gill and Ms. Lidy Nacpil who put together all the parts to form this final report.

We are happy to present this report to the constituencies of both the CCA and the WSCF-Asia and Pacific for their serious study and implementation.

 

World Student Christian Federation

Asia and Pacific Region, Hong Kong

Christian Conference of Asia, Singapore